I CANT put Lomachenko AHEAD of SOG or Bud P4P cause he has a loss...

I would love to hear a coherent argument for ranking Lomachenko, with his LOSS, ahead of Rigo on the P4P list..

 

Crawford's resume is better given the simple fact that, unlike Lomachenko, he doesn't have a LOSS on it...

 

Rigo hasn't done anything of significance at least 3-4 years years. Loma has.... use your head FFS...

 

Dumbshits like you are why people think a loss is the end o f a career....

 

So then you'd have no problem with ranking Orlando Salido as #1 P4P?

If not, why?

 

What has he done in the last many years to be considered? Securing one big win and doing nothing else? If that works for you, the so be it. You probably have lara as #3.

 

Rigo has the better resume AND, unlike Lomachenko, no LOSSES in the last 3-4 years.

1 + 1 = 2

 

You believe rigo hasd a better resume than Loma for the last few years?

 

A loss doesn't mean the end of a career - but 9-1 means you ain't getting the #1 spot on anyone's P4P list who has working brain cells...

 

Yes. LOSSES count.

 

Beat Lomachenko.

What exactly has Lomachenko done to be considered P4P #1?

 

That's what it means to you, that's about it. Your myopic view is what makes you a **** poster here.

So you think a guy with one good win deserves a top spot on some fake list? I guess that's why you think Rigo should be there after 4 years from his only real good win.

You probably think Lara is #3 based on his work 4 years ago too.

He isn't #1, nor should he be. Stupid.

Yet most people look at who you beat as some form of standings. Losers like you focus on losses as if they mean the world.

 

Salido's one good win is one more good win than what Lomachenko has on his resume.

 

Do you realise how clueless you look saying that?

 

Quality of victories, quality of defeats, frequency of the defeats. I dont consider salido the #1 p4p, but I dont consider him an easy fight, though. Do you? he has lost 1 out of every 3 matches, that's a lot, do you think that he is an easy win?. no, he isnt. Losing is not such a big deal, as long as you prove that you are a competent fighter.