>>> Only Lomachenko and Golovkin can get away with...

You're just spitting gibberish. I don't even know what you're going on about

 

All you are doing is crying about a P4P list that only fanboys give a huge **** about. And yes, you are bitter. You just don't realize it. Otherwise, why all the resentment over something 3G doesn't even control? All you do is come off like some punk who gets too angry. We already have one nay-sayer...don't need another...

 

Of course you don't. You don't have the intellect to understand what you read, and even less for what you are seeing.

 

Now that is rich. Your thread title? Is factually incorrect.

Marvin Hagler 'dragged' Hearns, SRL & Duran up! Please post me your previous critique of Hagler on this subject?

Many other examples: SRL dragged Duran up. Napoles jumped two to fight Monzon. Hopkins jumped two to fight Tarver... It is not uncommon.

You are a clueless arsehole.

 

All those people who liked this are clearly stupid too.

 

If this is the case, they should just fight at 126. But you are correct on Loma detractors demanding for this fight even at 130. It doesn't mean that Loma gets the same credit at 130 though, that's just extremely flawed logic.

 

Dragging fighters up from lower weights by enticing them with money in order to beat them up.

Reminds of this big fellow fellow named Suncho who frequented the bars looking for the smallest guy. He'd offer him friendship, got him drunk, took him to his apartment for a meal to meet his wife. Once there he began looking for a fight by using his wife as the reason.

"Does my wife look in any way familiar to you?"

"Well, don't think so...."

"Ah you don't think but it's possible eh?"

No matter how the smaller drunk guy answered it always a wound up with the little fellow getting the crap beat out of him.

 

The only reason lomachenko and rigo are fighting is because guys around there own weight class are too cowardly to face them and 'fans' who hate on lomachenko seem to be pushing for this fight also.
Rigo is too small and will get knocked out unfortunately.

 

Your ignorance knows no bounds.

What you described is not a fact, but this is:

Brook out weighed Golovkin.

IBF weigh in:
168 >167.8

Its not rocket science, its pretty basic counting.

 

Golovkin came to UK to sigh the contract with Eubank, but Eubank chickened out, so without any time, Brook asked for the fight, Hearn wanted to make that fight also, so Golovkin fought him. It destroyed Brook's career..........Hell, Golovkin beat Jacobs, who was a cruiserweight, a cheater, did not have to take drug tests, yet Golovkin did.............Golovkin knocked him down, out boxed him, staggered Jacobs with a jab, would have knocked him out if it had not been at the end of the round................Golovkin out jabbed the must bigger man...........

 

Brook vs Spence & GGG vs Jacobs are not the fights being discussed. You don't weigh in the past what you weigh in the future...what the ****, that's a new level of stupidity even for you.

That's like saying Michael Spinks was 200 pounds when he beat MacDonald..because he weighed that much in his next fight.


Once more:

Brook out weighed Golovkin.

IBF weigh in:
168 >167.8

 

So his own trainer just said he was 168 when fighting at Welter, which is what he was against Golovkin. That's a case closed.