Why Mike Tyson at his best beats prime Ali

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mike foreman, Sep 9, 2017.


  1. mike foreman

    mike foreman Member banned Full Member

    215
    116
    Sep 8, 2017
    And the price of tea in China is?

    Whether or not you think he was good he was a top heavyweight contender for many years. Further I believe theres a thread on this board where some fighters who felt Brunos, Foremans and Shavers power say Bruno fits right in.

    Foreman was also an ATG compared to Shavers and yet Shavers supposedly had a harder punch.
     
  2. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,838
    12,523
    Jan 4, 2008
    You're not getting any respect here because you're so obviously selective. You go on about the not so durable guys Ali didn't stop and ignore the very durable guys he did stop. No one without a similar agenda to yours will take that seriously.
     
    Ronnie Raygun likes this.
  3. mike foreman

    mike foreman Member banned Full Member

    215
    116
    Sep 8, 2017
    By stop I mean flatten. Yes he "stopped" Liston but we both know Liston retired in his corner with a shoulder injury. Or exhaustion and punching himself out had alot to do with Foremans stoppage.

    Youre saying "stopped" to imply that Ali did Liston like Tyson did Berbick or Ali did Foreman like Foreman did Roman which was not the case.

    Classic equivocation fallacy

    [url]https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/81/Equivocation[/url]
     
    Last edited: Sep 11, 2017
  4. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,838
    12,523
    Jan 4, 2008
    No I say "stopped" as in winning the fight by stoppage, whether it be by KO or TKO. We all know Ali wasn't the kind of fighter to just come out and smash I fighter. But he did quite often win by stoppage. In 8 of his 10 title fights in the 60's for example.

    Ali certainly wasn't like Bruno or Shavers, always looking to land that one big bomb. He was about tiring the opponent by making him throw the wrong punches at the wrong time, and gradually wearing him down with an accumulation of punches. In fact, there's reason to believe this made him extra effective against big punchers, since they expand more energy with their punches.
     
  5. mike foreman

    mike foreman Member banned Full Member

    215
    116
    Sep 8, 2017
    See Foreman. So unless Tyson would wildly swing for the fences like Foreman did and tire himself out, its not relevant against Tyson. Tyson at his best was more than a "big puncher".
     
  6. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,838
    12,523
    Jan 4, 2008
    Yes, he was. But his stamina didn't seem to be the greatest. Neither Douglas or Holy were seen as big punchers, and they got the job done.

    But I'm not saying that Ali would win by KO, or that he would win at all. There are some good arguments for Tyson's case in this match-up. And for Ali.

    What I'm saying is that Ali's punches had effect on even his biggest and most durable opponents, despite your singular focus on his less durable opponents. Chances are that his punches would have some effect on Tyson too.
     
    RockyJim and Glass City Cobra like this.
  7. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,524
    Apr 26, 2015
    The idea that Ali's punches were so weak they would do no harm to Tyson is absurd. Ask Foreman, Liston, Bonavena, Frazier, Lyle, Williams, if he had no power. Look at Fraziers face after fight 1 and 3. Light blows do not do that kind of damage.
     
  8. mike foreman

    mike foreman Member banned Full Member

    215
    116
    Sep 8, 2017
    Of course they would. Down the stretch perhaps, but its not like Tyson is going to be stopped in his tracks by the first Ali right hand he gets hit with.

    As a puncher, I'd say Pinklon Thomas hit harder. No im not saying Thomas was better than Ali. Im not saying Thomas would beat Ali (though a prime Thomas would hold his own). What I am saying and all I am saying is that he likely hit harder than Ali. Thomas did drop Alonzo Ratliff with a jab and while Ratliff wasnt the who's who of ATG's, I can't remember a case of Ali flooring a comparable level of opponent with a jab.

    The only way Ali stops a young Tyson is over many rounds with a massive accumulation of punches. But making it seem like Tyson would be halted in his tracks in round 1 is absurd.
     
  9. mike foreman

    mike foreman Member banned Full Member

    215
    116
    Sep 8, 2017
    They wouldn't do immediate damage. You're making it seem like Ali would halt Tyson in his tracks right after the opening bell of round 1.

    Foreman, Bonavena and Lyle suffered from exhaustion as much as being hit. Yes Ali could stop a tired Tyson. No Ali would not immediately hurt Tyson anymore than the numerous HARDER punchers Tyson fought.

    Williams had been stopped at least 3x before, was out of the ring for 2 years after almost being shot to death and had one fully functional leg.

    After nearly 45 rounds of fighting Ali FINALLY stopped Fraizer, but it was more so Futch not letting him continue and not once did he ever drop Fraizer even though Bonavena and Bruce had him down with single shots. We can skip what George Foreman did. Youre making it seem like Fraizer was out on his feet seeing stars or on his back in dreamland.
     
  10. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,524
    Apr 26, 2015
    Again you're lost.

    Please point to where I stated Ali stops Tyson in round 1.

    It would be competitive for 3-4 rounds. Once Tyson sees he can't stop Ali and can't hit Ali and in return he is being hit with everything but the kitchen sink he will become a different and docile fighter. No plan B. 5-6 more rounds of this and the bout is over.
     
    swagdelfadeel and RockyJim like this.
  11. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,838
    12,523
    Jan 4, 2008
    I don't think anyone has said that Ali would stop Tyson in his tracks with the first right he threw, so I don't know who you're arguing with. What I'm and others are saying is that Tyson likely wouldn't walk right through Ali's punches, like you suggested in the opening post.

    And as for Thomas, you don't seem to get it. I repeat, you can't just hang everything on power. Many fighters who punched harder than Ali didn't stop the quality of opponents that Ali did, since they didn't have his precision and timing, and didn't land as many punches during a fight. Power is far from the only component in how effective the punches are. Tyson faced several heavier punchers than Douglas and Holy, but...
     
  12. mike foreman

    mike foreman Member banned Full Member

    215
    116
    Sep 8, 2017
    Yea but youre saying that Tyson would respect Ali's POWER and Im saying he wouldn't anymore than he did Thomas power. Sure anyone can be stopped if they get hit enough times. Tyson couldnt take punches from Thomas eternally anymore than he could Ali eternally.

    As for the Douglas loss, sure if you put the best Ali against that horrible version of Tyson, you'll get something like what happened with Douglas/Tyson.

    On the other hand if you put the best version of Tyson against the version of Ali that got dropped by Henry Cooper, it'll resemble Tyson vs Marvis Fraizer.

    As for Holyfield, he fought a decent version of Tyson, not the best. And even then, he had to mix in umpteen headbutts to get the job done. Also I believe Holyfield is underrated as a puncher anyway.
     
  13. The Morlocks

    The Morlocks Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,717
    8,937
    Nov 21, 2009
    y. YOU know Mike, I feel sorry for you. There is no cure for stupid. Bruno as your example. Pathetic. And then to keep bringing him up in your argument. Bad arguing skills, terrible backup for your argument as long as the name Bruno is involved. Btw, if that IS the best name you have to defend Tyson, tells you how pathetic Mike s record was. Nobody ever has to defend Ali s career, he proved his heart and determination and ability in adverse situation s again and again. You Tyson can only make believe have Tyson win trying fights, because he NEVER DID. That's why you guys are so fanatical defending what never was shown. Bruno.... hahahahahahahahahaha Barney, you're gassed!
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.
  14. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,838
    12,523
    Jan 4, 2008
    But the thing is that Thomas didn't manage to land many clean power punches. He had some success with his jab, but not much with his right (which he claimed was injured for what it's worth). And even then he managed to hold Tyson off for a while. It was only when Thomas, who had drug problems, started to tire that Tyson finished him off.

    I'm trying to tell you over and over that power doesn't mean anything if you can't land. I don't know for sure if Thomas hit harder than Ali, but I know for sure that Ali had superior speed, timing and accuracy.

    You have to get over your obsession with pure power. If and how you land the punches is more important, even though power is of course good to have.

    It's clear to see that big powerful men like Liston and Foreman were rocked by Ali's punches already in the early rds (Liston in rds 1 and 3, Foreman in rds 3, 4, 5), so they obviously had some effect even early.

    Perhaps Tyson wouldn't be rocked early on like they were, but it's good bet he wouldn't just walk through those punches either.
     
  15. mike foreman

    mike foreman Member banned Full Member

    215
    116
    Sep 8, 2017
    Read again dummy.

    Point out where I said Tyson beat Bruno therefore he beats Ali!

    Point out where I said Bruno is bettter than Ali

    All I said is Tyson faced much harder punchers and used Bruno as an example for those of you swearing Tyson would respect Alis punching power when he didnt respect the punching power of much harder hitters.

    Thats what I said.

    The problem is that Im bringing up a lot of logical points in favor of Tyson and because you really cant refute the points you latch on to "Bruno" strawman all of my arguments by saying that Im saying or even implying "Tyson beat Bruno therefore he beats Ali". And then you start name calling.

    Which is par the course.