Pacquiao-Horn, Ward-Kovalev I, And Golovkin-Canelo: How Do You Rank Them In Order Of Closeness?

3
2
1

Dusty bin

 

Hmmm.

Horn-Pacquiao was closest imo, Kovalev won and GGG won clearly.

 

I scored the GGG/Canelo fight draw.
I scored Ward/Kov 1 for Ward.
I didn't watch Horn/Pac.

 

Well that shows YDKSAB...

 

I wouldn't term any of these as robberies.
IT may be just semantics, but I would term all three as 'gifts.'

I would term something a gift if, by giving the gift recipient every possible benefit of the doubt in every close round, you could get to the official decision.

All three decisions were wrong, IMO, and in order of seriousness, I would rank them:

Kov-Ward ( I had that 116-111 for Kov)
GGG-Canelo (I had that at 116-113 for GGG)
Pac-Horn (I had that at 115-113 for Pac)

The Kov decision was the worst in that the margin was greatest and and belts changed hands. That was the closest to being a robbery. I could get to 6-6 in rounds, but the KD would still decide the matter. Borderline robbery.


Full fledged robberies:

Lewis-Holyfield (Holy won two rounds)
Tito -Oscar (Tito took four rounds)

Ironically, Oscar, who was the victim of that robbery, sees nothing wrong with Saturday's result.

Or maybe he's a lying sack of Sh*t.

 

Close fights are not robberies. Unless a fighter is dominating they are leaving it up to the judges and how they score. Except for the 118 to 110 score card I had no problem with any of these results. Don't let your bias get in the way.

 

Canelo-GGG and ward-kovalev are even and pac-horn was a robbery

 

And you're an ALT that DKSAB!

 

Wow... it's you again. The lord of not knowing SAB...

Oh I'm not an alt btw... but whatever makes you feel better... your boy still lost!

 

You ****ing ALT. Learn boxing if you want to debate me son.

 

I actually thought they were all close fights and respectable decisions. Haven't re-watched Pac/Horn or GGG/Canelo yet though. Re-watched Kovalev/Ward several times though.

 

This