I had it 116-112 to Golovkin

when I heard the score card 118-110 I thought it was for golovkin initially even then that was to wide

 

I had it 116-113 for Golovkin

 

Legit card
It wasnt as big as a robbery as the lara fight by any means.

 

I also scored it 116-113 but i gave the shared round as the 5th, havnt seen anybody else giving the 5th a 10-10. although if it had to go to anybody it would of gone to GGG.

 

When I first saw it 116-112 Golovkin. Rewatching it two more times I scored it 117-111 for GGG.

 

Can we issue a fatwa for this then?

 

I would bet that 115-113 for GGG is what the majority of fans scored the fight, its what I had too. Anything for Canelo is a small minority

 

I had the fight 8 rounds to 4 Golovkin, same as Harold Lederman, but it could have been 9 rounds to 3, Golovkin won the fight fair and square...................even with Alvarez' judges.................

 

You sound like Adalaide Byrd or Teddy Atlas with your too-wide-to-be-taken-seriously scorecards.

 

Paulie had it 9 rounds to 3, many had it 9 rounds to 3, but I thought 8 rounds to 4 was being very fair. El Pollo lost the fight and there is not way you can say that Byrd is a great judges and had the score fight, over 90% on the Net polls had it for Golovkin and it wasn't even close..................Golovkin made the fight, you don't get points for laying on the ropes taking punches and trying to rest, even with your own corrupt judges.............

 

116-112 or 115-113 for GGG, GGG won exactly, but if be honest his victory wasn't convincing. Canelo showed excellent boxing skills.

 

120 to 108 Canelo.

And I am being generous in giving GGG only 108 points.

PS I hope Oscar hires me as a judge for a Canelo fight, any fight don't matter. In box me if you see this Oscar De La Hoya.