The issue with you, is that you base your arguments off other people's opinions. Hence you keep bringing up polls and media members. Try thinking for yourself for once. If you're so adamant on saying that there is no case for it being a draw, and it was a clear GGG win, then breakdown the clear GGG rounds. If those were your clear GGG rounds, 1, and 11, were highly debatable on both sides. I've seen people on both sides give Canelo 1 and 11.
Rankled....You are a little sensitive. I decided to give Nelo round 12. I originally had it for GGG but it was one of those rounds where Nelo did better so I gifted him an extra round. Still a clear cut win for GGG
Actually round 12 for Canelo was far more clear than Round 1 for GGG. So you scored it 7-5. So you're saying that all those rounds you listed were clear dominating GGG rounds correct? There is no argument for Canelo winning, 1 or 11. Or any rounds from 4-8.
There are hundreds of performance enhancing drugs on the banned list. We've seen cyclists abuse drugs used to treat severe asthma attacks on the day of races to improve their cardio, we've seen drugs used to thin blood to improve recovery times from training, while some drugs like steroids the benefits may last for years, the list is endless, and every drug is different, so whatever your research says, it is obviously complete rubbish.
My research is based on what PED experts have to say about using PEDs in combat sports. That carries more weight than your personal opinion. It's completely illogical to believe that Pac would use PEDs for such a tiny window of time so close to the fight. Your agenda and bias is obvious. It's cool. Just admit it. But look at Floyd before you look at Pac because basically admitted that he cheated, kay?
G supposedly won and was robbed but his punchstats need padding just to appear he has a case to go with walking forward and missing punches. Rematch, he's getting wrecked and everyone already knows this. Just wanted to call you clowns out on the bs. I've never seen such avoidance before on a simple topic ever on this board. The truth is they did this on multiple rounds and it's mostly due to your little hypejob not being as advertised.
Sure, buddy. You've been acting like a psycho for the last 2 hours rambling on and on about Canelo. But you had GGG winning? LMAO!!! FOH, weirdo!
I didn't know we had issues kid? I'm just providing a bit of insight and offering some talking points related to the fight. My stance isn't based on other people's opinions...it's based on reality. What actually happened inside the ring on Saturday and how rounds are supposed to be judged. You know, like clean effective punching, ring generalship etc. The polls were simply insights to those who said anyone with score cards in favor of GGG were biased. The majority of the public aren't biased or huge GGG fanatics. Many of the people listed were neutral or even leaning towards a Nelo victory
Can you agree that a draw is a plausible scorecard and that GGG did not win 7 clear cut rounds. Some of those rounds could have gone to Canelo.
I haven't got a bias, I believe almost every top sportsman is cheating, stuff like EPO is very difficult to detect unless you go crazy on it and let your testosterone levels go to abnormally high levels, and you most definitely would take it in the days leading to your event. It is only you who has the bias, you believe Pac is clean (and anyone else you support), but everyone else is dirty, which quite frankly is ludicrous. I don't know why am I even having this conversation with you, you live in cloud cuckoo land.
I mean it was a great fight. It was competitive and Alvarez gave a very good account of himself but the fact is he clearly lost. Styles make fights and GGG's was just a bit much for what Alvarez came to the ring with that night. He got out worked and fought GGG's fight. It happens to the best of them
In other words you mean, "I'm wrong, and I can't argue against your points, so let me try and be condescending and call you kid". K. Gotcha.