GGG's Punchstats were Padded

Cool man. At least you had the right man winning. At the end of the day there are a few that scored it for Nelo or had it a draw. Those are a bit hard to wrap my head around. At the end of the day it was a great fight. Competitive and fought on a high level. The controversial outcome was expected unfortunately

 

You don't like talking I take it? Texting is more your comfort zone....Conceding what exactly? I can only break down the fight, round by round if you and I watch the fight, round by round. Otherwise it's pointless because you are basing your argument for each round off of memory. Unless you are the rain main, there's no possibility of an accurate breakdown. Let's set a date to rewatch the fight and have this discussion because all you're doing is getting heated and that was never my intention.

 

All you do is type pointless ****, you don't actually provide any argument to prove that GGG won clearly, with no debate. Your argument is this, GGG clearly winning is reality, if you thought a draw was plausible you have a bias for Canelo. I don't care about a date. I don't get the point of you responding, besides wanting the last word. Do you want to argue about this or repeat yourself about realities, and bias.

 

EL....See what I mean. This is why I'm worried about you. Just take a moment to collect yourself and breathe easy. It's not about the getting the last word. In thought you weren't a child? I'm not biased at all. I thought GGG was going to win. That didn't happen.

So you think Alvarez did enough to make it a close fight? Not competitive....but close? Canelo wasn't back peddling just to get in some extra road work for the sake of conditioning. If GGG wasn't throwing and landing punches that were "significant", Nelo wouldn't have opted to fight going away or be on the ropes as much as he was that night. I didn't say Nelo didn't have his moments...He did, but it wasn't sustained or consistent enough to control the pace, tempo or range which GGG dictated.

If the work rate of GGG wasn't enough to have him win rounds clearly for you then it's not really a discussion. He landed more and threw more...if the jabs were really weak....Or if the straight right and hooks didn't affect Nelo, ask yourself the question of why did Alvarez choose to hop on his bike and avoid, evade and do whatever he could to keep as much distance between him and GGG as possible? I mean....if GGG was only "standing in front of him", throwing "weak ass punches", where only a "few punches connected", why wasn't Alvarez the ring general that night? Why didn't he just walk through GGG the way he did with Kirkland, Liam and Kahn?

 

Haha. I'm fine kid. Don't worry about me. I'm worried about you actually. I just told you that all you do is type pointless things, and you continue to do so. Hopefully you're just trolling. What you typed just now has not made your case of GGG winning 7 clear rounds at least, and having no case for Canelo getting the draw.

Anyways, since you know you've clearly lost, and won't actually provide actual arguments on why GGG won, I'll give you the last word. I feel like you're so butthurt about losing this one, you're never going to shut up, and this is the only victory you can get. If you actually come back and provide me 7 rounds with reasoning that GGG clearly won, I'll come back and debate. If not, I'll just leave with the victory, and give you the victory of the last word.

 

Too bad Golovkin had the wrong passport and ethnic background. I want to lose 9 rounds of a 12 round fight get twice the money and get a draw as well along with being able to call the shots in the rematch.

Where can I sign up for that???

 

I'll take your word for it EL. I'm still worried about you though. You seem like you're a good egg, just troubled.

I'm interested in your thought process. Why are you on a boxing message board getting insights and feedback if you feel it's pointless?

Everything I said relates to why GGG won clearly and the draw wasn't justified. It was just more granular and promotes a deeper level of critical thinking which may not be your thing? Just trying to help you out.

You keep going back to making this about you and I....like we are in some kind of competition. I don't see how either one of us are winning or losing. I mean it's intriguing because it's obviously real to you. It's why I think you're a kid and I called you that.

I mean....you are taking things way too personal kid. Maybe you should sleep it off? You are all heated and talking about being "butt hurt"....what's that have to do with boxing exactly? If it makes you feel better....you can have the victory. I'm just not sure what that means exactly?

 

It's a sweetheart deal that's for sure. Can't blame Alvarez for that. He's just going along for the ride...wouldn't you?

 

Tour de Vegas, GC Leader = Canelo. Who knew?

 

You're bias.

 

So... clearly GGG is a hype job and your boy Canelo lost to a hype job?

 

**** ISAL is here. Never mind ggg clearly won 9-3 LOL. I change my stance on GGG winning a close fight that could have been a draw. Friendly reminder that Isal thought Marquez beat Pac more clear in their third fight than Floyd beat Canelo. Isal logic=The Mexican won.

 

Punch stats have never been accurate or something that people should judge a victor on.

Punch stats are input by people so are prone to human error just as judging rounds is.

To decide the victor of a fight you needn't even be aware of punch stats, you should just watch the fight

 

I realize how much you love Mayweather thats why your butthurt. If you dont agree with something I said then refute it instead of acting like a spiteful girlfriend.