GGG's Punchstats were Padded

Funny how all these morons seem to believe that 30 second offensive bursts with shoeshine combos win rounds, not the other 2:30 controlled by his opponent.

 

this is your compubox
https://i.imgur.com/Hu0CtFN.gif

 

Those punches besides the uppercut missed but got counted...smdh

 

here's another one
https://i.imgur.com/Ijt87P6.gif

I don't want to ever hear about someone being outpunched again according to compubox. it is and has always been bull****

 

Yeah, it is completely crazy, it would be better if the TV companies disregarded them completely than feed the drones this nonsense. Complete BS.

 

Weird...this loser who hates 3G, picked against him, now creates this crapfest of a thread...based on his own crappy opinion? Provide something tangible or STFU loser...

 

Thread starter is a hater. You can't really take haters seriously when it comes to judging a fight involving the fighter they hate.

 

I still support Parker, if I see people not giving him a fair shake I'll chip in for sure. I never thought he was going to be the best HW anyway, not unless the division became devoid of talent.

This content is protected

Now I understand that lots of people predicted a GGG KO, and therefore need to readjust their view of GGG. Fair enough. But although I'm a fan, I've always kept it real.

You still haven't answered my main point, which is that errors in Compubox does not equal a conspiracy.

This content is protected

That's a false equivalency. Honestly, that argument reminds me of Pac fanboys after May 2, 2015.

Don't you get the irony? You rightly mock those with wild conspiracy theories of corruption but have started another of your own with far from complete evidence. In addition you said the fight was fixed to rob Canelo, that's an even wilder conspiracy theory which is easily refuted by maths - if you got random judges the odds are that they would've scored it for GGG.

This content is protected

Then you said that those who scored it for GGG were a "mob of idiots". You never answered when I asked you if guys like Terence Crawford, Rigo, Lennox, Badou Jack, Danny Jacobs, etc. are part of a "mob of idiots" and don't actually know the scoring criteria.

This content is protected

You are the one who is contradicting yourself left, right and centre whilst throwing insults around simply because you have an irrational dislike of GGG.

And your method is that you set-up unrealistic expectations of GGG ("Hagler and SRR") so that you can smash it and call GGG a hype job. Only a small minority had GGG anywhere near that class. Granted they have multiple alts on here and spam a lot. If I had my way I'd ban them for good and that would be that. But the mainstream media, the punters, the posters here whose opinions are worth anything, were more or less 50-50. That's a classic straw-man argument.

Your posts have plenty of correct points but at the end there is a straw-man or a false equivalency. When I point them out you change the subject, usually talking about how Canelo will win the rematch (I agree), which has nothing to do with the discussion. That's a red herring logical fallacy. Look at your replies to me - do you ever address the points?

If you honestly planned to answer these questions, I have the four questions in

This content is protected

for your attention and response.

I'm open to discussion if you are willing to answer things on topic.

 

1) I didn't say it was "worse", I just said it "reminds" me of them.

2) I did comment on them, I agreed that Compubox had an error.

You have just misrepresented my words twice.

I disagree about round 5, but reviewing my earlier post, I can see that it did not fairly represent your OP in regards to the punch-stat scoring of Round 5. I can apologize for that.

3) I did:

You even replied to it, you must have forgotten.

Might I note that you are the one using names and insults? And that you still haven't answered the four original questions?

You just misquoted me three times (numbered).

 

I don't take Compubox seriously. It's a couple of people pushing buttons trying to keep track of boxers who can block and slip punches at the last split second. It had Tony Thompson outlanding Wladimir Klitschko in their first fight. It had Floyd landing 200+ punches on Oscar and Oscar landing 120 or so on Floyd. That seems accurate if you count punches landed on glove and air.

It's a basic guide, nothing more.