Where does Rigo go on your p4p list if he beats Loma?

There is no deserving for #1 spot, its not choosing by merit & hard work...Its talent

Exceptional Talent is always favored, Rigo & Loma are geneticaly more talented than GGG or Crawford, the winner of Rigo vs Loma is #1 & loser is still #11

GGG & Crawford are more talented than average beltholders (they score more KOs), its part of human evolution favoring the dominant male. In boxing the slicksters tend to be always a little bit favored over the power-punchers

 

Crawford is a lot more than just a power puncher

 

There is, look at MCgregor vs Aldo in UFC, the fight lasted 13 seconds, this was a fight that happens once in 5 careers, a definition of a lucky shot on an equally good fighter, he could fight Aldo 100 times and 95 of the hundred it would go more than 2 rounds, so if Rigo beats Loma in 13 seconds, I would give him far less credit than I would if he beat him like 117-111 or something.

 

Well you can judge him going back to his amateur days.
Watching him completely dominate good fighters like Russell jr and Walters, who have been or are world champions takes some doing. He's made his last 3 opponents retire by overwhelming them with skill.
He halves opponents punching output in world title fights which is un heard of.
I could ask you the same thing about Crawford. 140 is possibly the worst division in boxing right now

It's so obvious to me that he's on another level (eye test) than anyone operating right now. Just my opinion of course.

P4p to me means who is the best right now? And just because Crawford beat indongo to unify doesn't prove he is better than lomachenko.

 

But what I mean, he would throw the same punch 100 more times and it wouldn't land, it's the law of probablity, when you go to your local shop and get a scratch card, there is a possibily you would win £100, but 99 times out of a 100 you would get nothing, that's what happend in their fight. When you throw 100 of these punches and 1 of them lands then it's not luck, only the law of probablity doing its job. However if the very first of those punches lands flush, then I consider that a lucky punch.

 

Rigos ex manager feels the same way about his old fighter facing lomachenko.
Crawford isn't getting pressured to go down to 135 and face loma is he?
There is a lot of double standards surrounding loma and I don't understand the hate?! People should just enjoy him while he's here because I honestly haven't seen anyone with his all around skill
[url]http://www.boxingnewsonline.net/guillermo-rigondeaux-is-making-a-big-big-mistake-says-former-manager/[/url]

 

Yet Crawford is deserving of praise?
They are both 29 and while lomachenko was amassing possibly the greatest amateur career of all time winning 2 Olympic gold medals Crawford Fought about 20 or so pro fights where his opponents had amassed about 180 defeats between them.

 

Lol I was waiting for the salido comment. You know the circumstances of that fight with the weight. Let's put it this way If Loma and Crawford were exactly the same weight lomachenko would wipe the floor with him.
Levels