Jim Jeffries vs. Luis Ortiz

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by reznick, Sep 27, 2017.


  1. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,631
    Mar 17, 2010
    How do you guys think a prime Jim Jeffries versus current Luis Ortiz goes?
    15 rounder.
     
  2. richdanahuff

    richdanahuff Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,468
    13,002
    Oct 12, 2013
    This content is protected
     
    BlackCloud, Pat M and mrkoolkevin like this.
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,610
    28,866
    Jun 2, 2006
    Fitz nearly killed Ruhlin and he one punch ko'd Sharkey twice.Jeffries was undoubtedly a solid hitter but not in Fitz's, Maher's, or Sullivan's class
     
  4. Gudetama

    Gudetama Active Member Full Member

    1,033
    906
    Sep 11, 2017
    It can be incredibly difficult to judge fighters from different eras, but these two guys were both born in the year 1875, so...
     
  5. Smokin Bert

    Smokin Bert Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,055
    6,799
    Sep 8, 2013
    It is too early to weigh in on Ortiz. he has shown potential, but, has fought very few live bodies. And, even if Ortiz isn't older than his stated age of 38, he is running out of time.
     
  6. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,631
    Mar 17, 2010
    I'm pretty sure Ortiz is 47 years old. And that Jeffries would take him out after taking some punishment.
    I think Wilder will end him within 5 too.
     
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,610
    28,866
    Jun 2, 2006
    Well he's the right age to be an acceptable opponent for Jeffries. Seriously Ortiz hasn't done anything to set me alight who has he beat?
     
    richdanahuff likes this.
  8. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,631
    Mar 17, 2010
    Ortiz is a guy who clearly gets his reputation from the manner in which he beats his opponents, moreso than who the opponents themselves are. Beating fighters in a better fashion than your higher rated peers is always a good start. He definitely has something special about him, who you combine his size, with his power, and his ring IQ.

    But with a prime, live athlete like Jeffries, for 15 rounds?
    I'm not sure how someone who could very well be 47 years old, would have the mobility, stamina, pace, or reflexes to defeat a fighter like Jim Jeffries.
     
  9. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    Jeffries by KO. Proven atg chin/stamina and proven against atg heavyweights.

    Ortiz will gas and when he does Jeffries would go in for the slaughter.
     
  10. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    60,904
    45,039
    Feb 11, 2005
    Jeffries has zero experience against athlete/boxers of Ortiz's level. Luis is not some tough potato eater off the docks.

    Luis out-dudes him.
     
  11. richdanahuff

    richdanahuff Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,468
    13,002
    Oct 12, 2013
    What atg heavyweights tested his chin?
     
  12. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    60,904
    45,039
    Feb 11, 2005
    What all time great fighters, who would be deemed heavyweights today and who were anywhere near their primes, test Jeffries?

    Oh, Johnson. That's right.
     
  13. richdanahuff

    richdanahuff Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,468
    13,002
    Oct 12, 2013
    Exactly and with Fitz we are still talking a 167lb man there is only so much power a middleweight can generate and Jeff couldn't duplicate the damage or power how hard could he have hit...compared to other heavies?
     
  14. richdanahuff

    richdanahuff Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,468
    13,002
    Oct 12, 2013
    Oh that's right and I can't remember did it pass? Lol
     
  15. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    60,904
    45,039
    Feb 11, 2005
    Should we start the thread where drunk, old Peter Jackson or that rip-snorting face first midget Sharkey or old @ss lightheavy Fitz or old @ss amateur boxer Corbett matches Jennings?

    Do we really want to see where that goes? Or will their lame defense be "they hung pretty well with Jeffries and HE was great!"