I never said Canelo would lose to any of them, and I'm not part of a hive like collective of GGG fanboys, I'm an individual that makes up his own mind I don't give a flying **** what GGG fanboys think. I've said countless times, Kirkland would die in the ring against GGG, does that sound like someone who'd be hyping Kirkland against Cotto after he's resuscitated?
Hahhahaha... He got a draw, and was lucky to get a draw when you consider Canelo swept rds 1-3 and 10-12. A feeler jab is not enough to beat the power punches Canelo was landing. You GGGoons were raving about how Canelo was going to get KO, how GGG had the POWER, how GGG was this KO machine that could KO not just bums but top notch fighters. Every top notch fighter he has fought which are only TWO he has gotten lucky to not gotten the L.
You are part of them, the reason all those GGGoons have so many alts and do so much trolling, including breaking forum rules is because YOU turn a blind eye since it fits your bias agenda.
I gave Canelo full credit for hanging in there and doing a good job, but he didn't win the match like you said he would, and most non-biased judges agree with me, not you.
You said GGG would beat Canelo, and that Canelo stood no chance, you were WRONG. I said the fight was a 50/50 fight with Canelo having the slight edge. The fight was a draw. If you score each round individually using pro fighting rules, a better case for Canelo can be made for having won the fight.
So then you agree Maravilla would have schooled Tornado in a rematch years later when they were both major commodities? You can either take a position that Marg always beats him because of styles or you can acknowledge that Sergio was green.
Yep, I said Golovkin would beat Canelo, and I was right, according to most non biased boxing publications and judges and everyone on planet earth that watched the match that doesn't carry Canelo's **** around in their cheek 24/7. I scored and everyone else scored the fight each round individually, like most normal people, after all, not sure what other way to score a match there is, and most of them came to the same conclusion I did, Golovkin won the match 116-112. Canelo did okay in Round 1, 50/50, won the second 55-45, it was not a walk away, 3rd was another 50/50, as was the 6th, 11th and 12th, the reality is, Canelo didn't demonstrably win any one round overwhelmingly.
I have to talk down to your level, like I said, provide me a list or GGGoons, I need to know who to be on the lookout for. I don't know of any one poster that is a die hard GGG beats everyone on planet Earth type poster, they like GGG and pick him, but most of the more illogical GGG fanboys have drifted away from the site, which pleases me, since I can't stand them either. The only -oons I see are Caneloons, seriously take a long hard look at yourselves in the mirror, you're all insane.
Their styles did not change much so based on your argument, you'd be the one claiming that Margo would always beat Sergio since it was a "style-thing" and all. IMO that "styles" argument is just a cop-out. IF you beat a person on any particular night that means you were the better man that night, end of.
Will not end well for Cotto....Been a Great Warrior but I think it's time He put his "Cue In The Rack"...
Oh so now everyone is a professional judge sitting at ringside? Ah, I see. The fight could have easily been scored 7-5 Canelo or 7-5 GGG, hence the reason it was a draw. I watched the fight without bias since going into the fight I said it was a 50/50 fight. You on the other hand invested a lot of your time trying to convice everyone why Canelo stood ZERO chance. Who is bias here? Its ok, we have a rematch in less than a year, and this time instead of predicting a 50/50 fight I am inclined to favor the fighter who took less physical damage which was Canelo.
LOL, you're full of ****... You're a bias clown. You're dumb ass thinks Saunders, Lemieux, Curtis Stevens, Peter Quillin, and Andy Lee stops CAnelo. You also think Monroe outboxes Canelo, and Rosado-Canelo is a 50/50 fight. LOL You're a dunce.