try again with froch beating kessler? let me know why that needs trying again. let me know..or heres a quick scheme of what follows to save time - 1. Gee -"Froch beat Kessler, so Froch is elite" 2. Odour - "no Kessler beat froch and i lie/deny that froch beat kessler, so froch is not elite" 3.Gee - "you've just lied again refer to point 1". continue until Odour has lied 1 million times.
SOB beat Kessler with an illegal headbutt that came from across the ring, an intentional headbutt, Ward's referee stopped the fight and called it a TKO! (by intentional illegal headbutt) SOB fouled the entire fight, he had his referee, judges and boxing commission, that's how a referee can help you win a fight, just like hitting Kovalev in the testicles three times in a row!
froch one fight before ward was the same man as one fight after, unless you are trying to claim he was replaced by a doppelganger of more talent? Are you trying to claim that froch was replaced by a more talented twin brother/doppelganger after losing to kessler? let me know if you are,becos this is your only case. froch beat kessler, an elite, and lost only to an elite, kessler and ward. This fits definition of elite, I refer you to the step 1 in the post above if you disagree.
Ha. No you claimed Froch was elite because he had beaten fellow elites such as Pascal and Kessler. Now, Pascal was never elite, good fighter but far from "elite" and at the time of the Ward fight Froch had faced "elite" Kessler but had Infact LOST....therefore Froch wasn't "elite" as he hadn't beaten any fellow "elites" and the 2 he had faced in Kessler and Ward he had LOST to. Easy work...way to easy.
Froch beats Kessler = World population can see he must be elite. Froch beats Kessler = Odin says hes not elite ok, as you say, easy work.
Your proof is that Kessler beat Froch - yet the definition of an elite is that they beat all, except perahaps other elites - frochs loss fits the definition perfectly- he lost to an elite. froch confirmed he was elite with the win over kessler, but that doesnt mean that the night before the fight he wasnt elite. Sorry you cannot grasp this. Froch had the ability in his prime to beat elites Kessler and Pascal, and proved it. Sorry you cannot grasp this. pascal was elite, sorry if it hurts your feelings. He had the ability in his prime to beat hopkins (still elite in his 30s), Bute (elite) and Dawson (elite). Sorry you cannot grasp this.
Dawson and Bute are not elite fighters at all. And Pascal never beat Hopkins....another fail from you. And if by beating Kessler makes Froch "elite" then he wasn't "elite" at the time of the Ward fight because he hadn't beaten Kessler at that point you ****ing muppet. Your dogged determination to continuously embarrass yourself is admirable.
they were. ok,a draw. thats matching an elite. Much like 3G matched Canelo, thus he strengthened his claim to elitedom. Unless you want to argue 3G isnt elite too, thats a fail from you. It is a win for you ONLY if yo concede that 3G is NOT elite in any way. Let me know how you feel on that. Yeh you wont claim that as a win now. at what point was he elite? the night before? or the night after the fight? no, he was bona fide elite of the super six. you fail.
Well Golovkin was already elite, I mean if you are classing Dawson and Pascal as elite then Golovkin had already beaten Jacobs and Lemieux who are as "elite" as Dawson and Pascal. A draw is not a win.....you FAIL. At what point was Froch elite? By your logic it's after the super 6 as he lost to both Ward and Kessler during the tournament. Keep digging it's funny.
This forum needs draining, Dino has gone I don't know why the mods allow HerolGee who is far worse to continue to troll the board.