I am mildly aroused Bunch of queens fighting over men who are stripped to the waste fighting for purses & belts & diamond.. Fisting in the Ring!! Jab it into his face, go on... Give it him! Put him on his back! Broke back mountain extras
LOL, your ******* is full of Canelo's semen. YOU ARE THE MOST BIASED CLOWN ON THE SITE, but you're just too ****ing stupid to realize it. Saunders would probably UD Canelo, and get robbed, Lemieux can potentially stop anyone he gets in the ring with, Lee has that same puncher's chance as well, yet the chinny Lee could easily be KO'd as well, Quillin I've never thought much of, so no, never made that claim, at least not seriously. I've never thought Monroe outboxes Canelo or Rosado stops him, because I'm reasonable, unlike you. You're a **** for brains.
No, it couldn't have easily been scored 7-5 for Canelo, giving Canelo more than 4 rounds is a stretch, if you literally bend over backwards and ignore everything that GGG lands in certain rounds, then maybe you can give Canelo 6 rounds, the only people who think Canelo won the fight is B-Hop and ODLH, and even they don't believe that, they have to, because he's their cash cow. You said it was 50/50, because you knew Canelo would probably lose and wanted some wiggle room, I didn't give myself one iota of wiggle room, and I was right, I didn't need it, GGG won, and the rest of the Mexicans in the crowd that were booing the decision agree with me as well. I have the opinions of everyone who watched the fight that isn't a kooky psychotic troll on my side, you have Adalaide Byrd on yours, that says it all right there. And what the **** are you liking this for @ElCyclon? You don't agree with this clown, I gave Canelo full credit, I thought he performed magnificently, but still lost, I was very impressed that he was able to hang in there and make as many rounds as he did competitive, and like I've said several times before, I like Canelo.
I had it 8 rounds to 4, but it really could have been 9 rounds to 3 Golovkin. Lederman had it 8 rounds to 4. Paulie had it 9 rounds to 3. over 90% had Golovkin winning that fight, he could have stopped Alvarez if he had thrown a few body punches...................but remember, Alvarez ran most of the fight..............
For those who don't want it to be Lemieux, the other candidates under consideration for the December 2nd date are: Miguel Ángel García and Jermell Charlo. García has wasted enough of his prime, I really don't want him to waste an entire quarter/third of a year ballooning up two weights for a cash grab that does nothing plus or minus for his legacy or Cotto's no matter the outcome. Charlo would just be a snoozer of an opponent not worthy of Cotto's final bow-out, though on merit he probably is deserving of a Cotto type payday. It would be one-sided though, and I don't see Cotto rushing to sign himself up for such a match-up that so poorly favors him stylistically.
They could always dredge up Rosado. Rosado always comes to fight, win or lose. If he beat Cotto I'd be happy for him.
David is the perfect choice for swan song fight for Cotto. David is an action guy, the danger is there but he's limited enough that Cotto can maneuver and "bawx" his way to a decision. I'm not sold on the David is a better boxer these days rhetoric.
Gabe is already fighting Glen Tapia in a couple of weeks. (then again, Charlo is also facing Erickson Lubin this month and said he would be up for a quick turnaround for Cotto in December, so...)
Oh well, that's all I had. I guess Cotto could always fight Khan if he wants to say farewell in style
Charlo has even said that he is offended he's fighting Lubin and doesn't understand how a "mere" prospect got to be his mandatory.
You don't know how to score a fight, your boy almost looked like Hughie Fury in there LOL 9-3 Old man Golovkin.