Bernard Hopkins: Golovkin-Canelo 2 Will Be A Repeat of Kovalev-Ward 2...!!!

Time is not a fixed vacuum. What may have been true years ago is not true today. Not terribly hard to understand.

 

When Oscar, Canelo & Byrd are involved anyone who doesn't have misgivings is IMO naive not to factor this in.

 

I had to go check the thread title with what he just put ! Hes trolling, he knows Hopkins has a business interest/opinion with Canelo !

 

Don't confuse him.

40 yr old GGG is still going to KO his opponents like the 30 yr old one.

 

LOL! Some boxing fan you are. Yeah right... The boxing politics were on his side - your point? It was the best fight that could have been made for him - and the one fans wanted to see. You're right though(in a sense) GBP factored in risk-reward in their decision not to make the fight for the better part of 2 years. It was a duck plain and simple.

Don't try to draw equivalencies with me - you and I are talking about Golovkin here. NOT Ward.

 

This is all you know how to do isn't it...talk about what fans say? Make snide comments as if YOU are any better? Everythibg about is "Fans said 3G was gonna...."..."Fans say he's the best MW ever!!"...

All this stupid crap you buy in to. If you had brains, what 3G fans say wouldn't matter to your personal opinions on him.

But 4 year ago, people starting talking about 3G versus Floyd. And you and the other idiots went in to full on hater mode over that.

 

I did think for myself which is why I picked Canelo to win by decision. I'm pointing out the hypocrisy of GGG fans who said that he would KO Canelo but that didn't happen now they want to cry about judges.

 

I watched the fight 3 times the first time watching it live I scored it for Canelo the 2 other times I scored it a draw. You're right Canelo didn't win but neither did GGG, so stop acting like he did.

 

You picked him simply out of spite for Golovkin and because he was a FMJ scalp.

 

And didnt Oscar even say the plan was to stall and let GGG age? Lol

 

What fans predict as an outcome and how bad judges are have nothing to do with one another. That's not even CLOSE to the definition of hypocrisy Pimp.

Picking canelo to win doesn't mean you think for yourself. You still allow the posts of fans to determine how you proceed and how you post. That's why you, and about a hundred others here, allow posters to make your choices.

 

'Judge's' (plural) No. A judge? Yes.

Byrd. She has history. You think we are wrong to have misgivings about this? It stunk. She's totally useless.

Just to be clear, you have never had a problem with judging?

 

Coming from the same group who thinks a 41 year old PBF who fought at 130-154 with nothing left to prove is still prime and want him to fight at 160 that's hilarious. Practice what you preach.

 

At last. Amen..

You're beginning to get it.

 

Of course you don't want me to bring Ward in it because it shows your double standards and hypocrisy GGG fans had every excuse in the book as to why GGG didn't need to fight Ward. Some boxing fans you are. Didn't want to see Ward-GGG, shame on you all.