Do people here honestly think that defense wins you points in boxing?

1. We are talking about scoring boxing matches.

2. You keep mentioning "action" and "dictating action" over and over and over.

So, your post here strikes me as pretty odd. Have you failed to remember or re-read your posts?

 

Yes! Featherfists don't belong in the sport. The rules had to be artificially changed in the early 20th century to accommodate those kinds of guys who make their living off of point scoring. For centuries, fights used to go until someone lost or submitted. We really shouldn't need judges. If you can't hurt someone, you have no business fighting. Go into track or gymnastics or something.

 

That was a good one Lance. Now you're going second grade on me. Youre mom would even see G wasn't all that effective. Now go back to playing bridge with your ugly wife

 

He did and landed the better shots that round. Get over it dude.

 

Do you score Leonard/Hagler for Hagler then because you don't score Leonard's lighter pitty pat punches?

 

Second grade? Did you even make it that far? Wow! I've seen that it's difficult to advance when you're a crackbaby. good on you lil boy!

 

If his work in the round was enough for you to give him the round, then fine. But no need to lie about non-existent big uppercuts.

 

Need to watch it again but I originally had it for haglar.

 

Calls out both guys effective shots. He even remembers the round, pauses, calls the shot out then resumes play lmao

You just don't like how he calls out G's ineffective shots. He was mostly dead on.

 

Timestamp the video. Point me at which point of the rd 9 where Canelo landed those effective uppercuts that almost took G's head off like the guy in the video suggested. Show them.

 

Timestamp where he didn't and when the guy lies. He called the round good and scored it the way it's supposed to be scored. Once again you're mad he calls out all of G's pity pat crap and weak tentative shots. Here's the video for anyone to see.

This content is protected

 

So let me get this straight: You post a video analysis, claim that It's dead accurate, I point out that there was no clean, effective uppercuts from Canelo unlike the guy in the video claimed, and now I'm supposed to show you the parts of the round where Canelo didn't land the uppercuts? What the hell are you smoking?

You're beyond pethatic dude.

And FYI, the guy lied about the uppercuts from Canelo at 09:37 mark.

 

Thank you!

 

the only reason dictating action was even mentioned, was because you brought it up as a point, and i corrected you. did you fail to remember that?