Felix Trinidad v.s GGG at 160??

Tito is a great, but he fights in straight lines and with very little head movement, also he won't be the bigger man in this fight.

Alvarez and Jacobs pose completely different problems than that of Tito who will be there to be hit and he's been put down by lesser fighters than GGG.

Even at 35 GGG would have too much for him, Tito gets broken down in 8.

 

Drainlube invented so much stuff just like Nay Sayers ancestors. LOL

 

I think Hopkins level of opposition during his 160 reign is arguably worse than that of GGG'S.

Not their fault but Golovkin has been far more dominant, I mean do you think GGG would have to fight Robert Allen 3 times to prove superiority?

 

Save your breath, you are arguing with a pencil neck geek!

This content is protected

 

Give it a rest you pencil neck geek!

 

Ggg was supposed to destroy Canelo and Jacobs. He couldn't. We can't jump to any conclusions like that due to G's lack of credible opposition. Tito was a marathon runner and he has faster handspeed and faced far better competition.

 

Lack of "credible" opposition?.....says who? Guys like you who rave over Hopkins reign?

Canelo is elite, very seldom do elite fighters get "destroyed", Tito was meant to destroy Hopkins and Wright, that didn't work out well.

Who are the fighters that he faced that are "far better" than GGG?

 

Youre starting to make sense old boy. Did you go to church today?

 

Going to church does the opposite

 

Look at Hopkins resume even in his 40's. Tito was the favorite idiot.

 

But Tito lost.

And I have looked at Hopkins 160 resume and it's full of AmeriCans and road sweepers.

The fact he lost to the only 2 athletic 160lbers he fought in RJJ and Taylor....plus Golovkin wouldn't have to fight Robert Allen 3 times.

Only one idiot here and it is not me.....

 

G has yet to fight the caliber of RJJ or Jermaine Taylor while he was 40+ lmao

Your guy is old already at 35. No, I'm not the fool.

In fact idiot. Watch the JT fight against a fresher Ouma and then watch how G looked against Ouma lmao

You guys are clowns dude.

 

Well as you stated he's 35....not 40 and it's not really an argument when he lost both fights, if he'd of won you'd of had an argument.

But just to be picky he wasn't in his 40 's when he got spanked off RJJ.

 

Wrong again idiot. Let's see G fight past next year. He never reaches Bhop so don't even through a true great in this conversation.