Whats with this idea that Joe Louis was a weak champ or not as great a fighter as once thought?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Rafaman, Oct 21, 2017.


  1. VVMM

    VVMM Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,372
    344
    Nov 16, 2012
    Because somebody called "legend" this doesn't mean he's untouchable.
    Otherwise Tucker couldn't reach his full carrier potential because the prime Tyson and a very good Lewis
    crossed his way but he went the distance and showed decent performances.
    Joe Louis never beat similar H2H great fighters like Tyson or Lewis.His best opponent was the only
    184 lbs Rocky who destroyed him easily.Maybe this Joe wasn't 100% but he showed nothing but at least
    the shot Tucker went the distance with Lewis and won rounds and he could chase the tired Lennox.
    All in all Joe Louis vastly overrated like the Metallica.
     
    Saad54 likes this.
  2. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    29,756
    20,213
    Apr 3, 2012
    If Tony Tucker had Louis' mentality, he would've been the best heavyweight of all time. The only problem is that his was closer to Henry Akinwande's.
     
    choklab likes this.
  3. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,676
    7,669
    Dec 31, 2009
    Tucker was good enough at one point to give a good champion a run for his money. And he did. But that’s all. Nothing wrong with that.

    People forget Louis dealt with guys expected to give a good champion a run for his money rather easily. Guys like Lou Nova. That guy would have been a serious threat in any era but nobody remembers much about him because of how good Louis was. Ray Arcel said Nova would have given any champion all he could handle.
     
    Last edited: Oct 22, 2017
    Pedro_El_Chef likes this.
  4. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,299
    49,756
    Apr 27, 2005
    What good champion did Tucker give a run for his money?
     
    Ronnie Raygun likes this.
  5. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,676
    7,669
    Dec 31, 2009
    Tyson.
     
  6. Balder

    Balder Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,881
    1,900
    Nov 10, 2012
    Joe louis has always been slightly overrated.

    People are beginning to figure that out. He had some weaknesses and they could be exploited in the right matchup.
     
  7. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,299
    49,756
    Apr 27, 2005
    I wouldn't call lasting the distance giving him a good run. Tyson won by a big margin on all cards.
     
  8. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,676
    7,669
    Dec 31, 2009
    He did prove to be one of the few live challengers Tyson got. He even beat the guy who knocked Tyson out.
     
    Pedro_El_Chef likes this.
  9. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,716
    30,655
    Jun 2, 2006
    Tucker was 36 and 37 years old when he lost those 3 fights. Joe Louis was getting ko'd by Marciano at that age.
     
  10. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,299
    49,756
    Apr 27, 2005
    Well if live is spoiling to an easy decision loss yes. Just because he didn't roll over in the early rounds like so many others doesn't = giving Tyson a "good run" tho. Imo anyways.
     
  11. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,747
    21,593
    Nov 24, 2005
    I think Tucker gave Tyson a decent fight. To be fair.
    It wouldn't matter if Tyson won every round on every score card, Tucker was making him work and hitting back. He never allowed Tyson to administer a sustained beating. Tyson had to grind out the win and outbox Tucker for every point.
    I'm not saying Tucker gave a great performance or anything but it was decent/good.
     
    Pedro_El_Chef, choklab and Contro like this.
  12. Contro

    Contro Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,882
    4,720
    Jun 7, 2016
    That tucker looked to me like a very good fighter who wasnt missing any attributes but just happened to be in with an exceptional fighter entering his peak. And i dont see why it would be absurd to think that he could, with his height chin and movement give Louis trouble.
     
  13. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,928
    6,810
    Dec 10, 2014
    Of course Louis was great.

    But some have given him mythical status.

    It's blasphemous to some to say, for example, someone like Oliver McCall could last the distance with him, when most evidence points to this being the likely outcome.
     
    Last edited: Oct 23, 2017
  14. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,928
    6,810
    Dec 10, 2014
    Tyson and Lewis.
     
  15. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,928
    6,810
    Dec 10, 2014
    It was like 117-111.

    He was the first guy to visably stop Tyson in his tracks and make Tyson respect his power. After the fight, it was generally acknowledged to be a very good performance by Tucker. By most definitions, he "gave Tyson a run for his money."

    And this was basically an absolute prime Tyson who still had exceptional head movement/defense. He slipped the Tucker jab very impressively. This wasn't a Tyson who attacked in a straight ahead and straight up fashion.

    It should be noted, that Tyson went on a streak of rather easy KOs after beating Tucker.

    He also gave Lewis a much tougher fight than many expected, going the full 12 and winning 3 or 4 rounds, several months after Lewis blew out Razor Ruddock. And, that was a Tucker who was clearly past his prime.

    And, he had kod Buster Douglas a few months before facing Tyson.

    Tucker could certainly fight.

    He was very tall, had excellent reach,had a good jab, had good lateral movement, and had a very solid chin. he didn't have great power, but was hardly feather fisted. That big left uppercut certainly got Mike's attention. His defense, once he stopped moving wasn't great, but his chin made up for it. He had decent stamina, pouncing on Buster Douglas when he slowed down in the later rounds.
     
    Last edited: Oct 23, 2017
    Contro and NoNeck like this.