Twenty seven years ago, Holyfield "upset" Buster Douglas

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by InMemoryofJakeLamotta, Oct 27, 2017.


  1. Contro

    Contro Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,882
    4,690
    Jun 7, 2016
    Holyfield was smart enough not to trade with tyson. Just like he was smart enough not to do it with Foreman and not to do it excessively with Bowe after he lost the first one.
    I like both guys and Holyfield would have always troubled him because he was just as fast, just as strong if not stronger (once he bulked up to 215+), had just as good of a chin(plus the ability to stick and move when things dont go his way while tyson because of his height and style just continues to absorb punishment when things dont go well) and had studied him inside out and was obsessed with beating him.
     
  2. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    25,092
    15,876
    Apr 3, 2012
    Did you consider that the contenders might have been avoiding fights with each other because they were waiting to be paid vs Tyson?

    Spinks also took the money fight against Cooney. It's dollars, not conspiracy.
     
  3. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    51,585
    41,758
    Apr 27, 2005
    Berbick wasn't "mediocre" by just about anyones stetch. He was a solid contender for many years and won the strap off a very good heavyweight who had been on a roll. He'd shown toughness many years earlier as well going 15 rounds with Holmes.
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.
  4. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    Rubbish, Holyfield traded with Tyson plenty of times in their bouts and always came off best. He clearly was the harder puncher in there, Tyson knew it.
     
  5. Contro

    Contro Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,882
    4,690
    Jun 7, 2016
    Holyfield himself said he was smart enough not to take any of tysons bombs flush, there are plenty of interviews of him saying that. He always rolled with the punches in the exchanges while Tyson squared himself up and got nailed.

    And once again you choose to believe your own narrative over Tysons Opponents' personal anecdote.
     
  6. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,672
    7,630
    Dec 31, 2009
    Sure they were on hold whilst they awaited a shot. They didn't want to risk missing the payday. Perhaps they went off the boil? It is true more guys than normal challenged Tyson without beating rated men for up to three years.

    Tubbs had to beat Smith to get Page. Bruno had to beat Coetzee to get Witherspoon. Smith beat Bey to get Witherspoon. Berbick beat Thomas after beating Bey and Mitch Green.

    Bey, the last heavyweight to challenge Larry, beat Page to get Holmes.

    It was different once Tyson became champion.
     
    Last edited: Nov 3, 2017
  7. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    You can still trade with someone and try to evade their shots, if not Tyson never traded with Holyfield.
     
  8. Contro

    Contro Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,882
    4,690
    Jun 7, 2016
    Yes thats true but the way holyfield traded with bowe in the first fight was different to how he traded with tyson.
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.
  9. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    Maybe because he had more confidence in his tank or maybe because he was less experienced, who knows?
     
    Contro likes this.
  10. Contro

    Contro Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,882
    4,690
    Jun 7, 2016
    I think it was the overconfidence of an undefeated fighter. He was reckless in the first Bowe fight and i think the loss taught him a lot.
    Holyfield always came in physical shape but he didnt always use his brains and skills to the fullest before his first loss
     
  11. JackSilver

    JackSilver Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,962
    4,802
    Jun 24, 2017
    Yeah up to that fight Holyfield was able to overwhelm or outpunch everyone that he met. That applied obviously with the cruiserweights but even with the bigger stronger heavyweights he could beat them just by throwing short but fast high volume bursts of punches. This was until he met Bowe who was not only bigger and stronger but was durable enough to take Holyfields punches and fast enough to hit him back with his heavier punches.
     
  12. Contro

    Contro Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,882
    4,690
    Jun 7, 2016
    Well he could do it with dokes, cooper and holmes but he didnt even try it with foreman. Bowe is lucky that holyfield was as dismissive of him as he was, because Holyfield would have lost his title a year sooner, and by stoppage imo if he tried with Foreman what he tried with Bowe.
    Bowe showed a great workrate and a combative spirit. But when you think about it, if he was as good as some people think he was he should have blown out holyfield much worse than he did given the size advantage and the stupidity of holyfields decision to brawl with him(george benton actually wanted him to stick and move)
    I always thought of holyfield as the much better fighter.
    Could you imagine frazier getting on his toes and try to outbox PEAK ali and only lose a competitive decision?
     
    Last edited: Nov 3, 2017
  13. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    15,162
    10,802
    Sep 21, 2017
    I've always said that the 80's contenders were as good as the 70s contenders. I mean, Berbick vs Bonavena could go either way, but it wouldn't be a one sided massacre
     
  14. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    15,162
    10,802
    Sep 21, 2017
    You have to be the only one who rates Holyfield a harder puncher than Tyson.
     
  15. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    15,162
    10,802
    Sep 21, 2017
    So who should Tyson have fought instead?