GGG is - at the very least - the Greatest middleweight since Hagler

So are all 3 judges who scored Canelo G corrupt/incomptent, or just Byrd?

 

lol my boy shadow loves writing novels.

 

Your defense of Canelo's Championship status....is a quote of the man himself saying he is not A middle weight champion.

The fuk..

 

Do you really have to ask that?

 

I'm simply pointing out that it wasn't because "it marked a full year where Canelo did not fight within MW range" as you suggested it was because. It turns out that the TBR has an 18 month requirement to defend a title within a division, not 1 year like you wrote. It was due to that quote, not due to him not fighting within the MW range in the required timeframe.

A simple "Thank you shadow111 for pointing that out" would be appreciated since you brought up the TBR and the reason you gave as why he wasn't Listed as Champ at MW. In the quote he stated that he wasn't a MW Champion, in that he didn't hold a title belt by one of the alphabet organizations. (WBC) Surely this was what Canelo was referring to, whether or not he was a belt holder at MW.

 

I take that as a Yes. So let me get this straight, it wasn't just Byrd that was in on it, but it was the other 2 judges too? Even the judge that had Triple G winning, was he paid off by DLH too lol.

 

You didnt even ask a yes/no question. Jesus ****in Christ, were you dropped on the head inbetween posts?

 

I never commented on any rule. Their member asked Canelo his status, because he had not defend the title in a year. Its all on the site.

You are putting words in Canelo's mouth, the man couldnt have been more clear. On site, someone asks about the quote and they explain in detail. Again, take it up with them.

 

That was actually that funniest exchange I read on this forum. How do you ask a question like that and then come with "I'll take that as a yes"? What would a yes even mean in that context lmao

 

i'm not. y u repeating your lie 5th time over?

 

Dont worry, expect a 2 page long post from him explaining how we are stupid and it really was a "yes/no" question the whole time.

 

I asked So are all 3 judges who scored Canelo G corrupt/incomptent, or just Byrd?. A yes would obviously mean that he thought all 3 judges were corrupt/incompetent.

Since he responded by saying "Do you really have to ask that?" naturally that would indicate that in his mind it was so obvious that all 3 judges were corrupt or incompetent, that there was no need to ask.

You got me all figured out Kentucky Cobra. But yet I thought all I needed to do was post in only "a few sentences" for you not to complain about my posts. Then I do that, and you start with this whole "it wasn't a yes/no question" lmao. Why don't you try, ya know, staying on topic and discussing the substance of the posts? Do I really need to spoon feed you everything lol? I broke it down in "only a few sentences" just like you wanted, not two pages, so there's no excuses now. Lost in all this is your apparent claim that all 3 judges in Canelo G are either corrupt or incompetent. That's quite a claim. Care to elaborate? Is it all just one big conspiracy?

 

I was right. Lol

And Strawmen galore.

 

You brought up the TBR and suggested he wasn't Lineal because 1 year had elapsed since he fought in the division. I went ahead and looked into it, as I wanted to know why myself, and I found out why their MW crown had been open, that it was because of a quote by Canelo, not because he hadn't fought in the division for a period of time. I'm not putting words into Canelo's mouth. It was vague in the sense that he simply said "he wasn't a MW champion" which could have been referring to the WBC belt he vacated, as opposed to being recognized as the Lineal Champion.

 

You got me all figured out Kentucky Cobra. I walked right into your "trap" lmao. You're really pulling out all the stops with the whole "it wasn't a yes / no question". Anything to avoid having to discuss what you claimed, which was absurd lmao.