GGG is - at the very least - the Greatest middleweight since Hagler

Here's a great example of how you don't pay attention to what I said. I said it's satisfying to see Triple G's fans terrified of the rematch. Triple G's "fans" terrified of a rematch, not Triple G himself! (see thread "GGG should go for the last trinket, and if he cant get the fight, retire" anotherwords "duck" the Canelo rematch)

And here you go completely misrepresenting what DLH is quoted as saying the winner of Saunders and Lemieux was an option but his first priority was the G Rematch. And it wasn't "Canelo" that said that, it was attributed to DLH. So here you are saying Canelo "wants" something that not only did he not say he wanted, but even the person who said that, his promoter DLH, still made it clear that the G rematch was the priority.

Can't you see what you're doing here. You're exaggearting twisting and spinning all these reports in whichever way you can for effect. Canelo doesn't want to fight the winner of BJS Lemieux next, he clearly wants to fight G next. If G was ready to go again in December, great, the fact of the matter is that Cinco De Mayo weekend is the date that makes the most sense, it's just business. FYI I like you wanted an immediate rematch in December. Reality is that neither Canelo or G really have a say as to when the rematch occurs. It's got more to do with promoters and what makes business sense. No need for you to misrepresent like you have, it comes across as disingenuous.

 

Which has been disproved by her judging a card two weeks ago.

Good. Glad I could be of some assistance debunking your report that she was supposedly suspended/benched from all fight scoring for the unforseeable future. I guess all those reports that she was banned from "all fight scoring" was just complete nonsense huh lmao. It doesn't change ****? Sure it does, she's still working fights, contrary to the report.

 

You are mentally ******ed, you didnt debunk anything of mine.

It was widely reported by every media outlet. Bob Bennett said it, commission officials said it. Espn, SI, La Times, New York Daily, Independent, its not nonsense ya fukin tool.

A month later, she works a low profile card. That just means they lied or changed their minds.

And doesnt change anything, her card was still so controversial, they told reporters she was being benched and would not work a major fight again. Even if they lied to reporters, you cant erase controversy.

 

OK great how does that make me mentally anything? Why do you feel a need to make such imbecilic personal attacks as part of your schtick? Are you that insecure about yourself that would need to go that route?

Bottom line, the reports that she was banned from boxing and all that jazz were greatly exaggerated. You weren't even aware she worked a fight 2 weeks ago. I informed you. You're welcome.

 

Again with the name-calling. Grow up. Espn, SI, La Times, New York Daily, Independent were probably full of Triple G crybaby fanboys like yourself all butt hurt & in denial over Canelo whopping G on Sept 16 and made up a bunch of crap about Byrd's future. Wouldn't be the first time, look what happened to CJ Ross. She was exiled for real, but then again G and his minions apparently don't have the pull of FMJ and TMT.

Well it changes the idea that she would never work a fight again as was reported. I'm not denying her card was controversial, well see if she works a major fight again but she may not due to all the crybabies out there who can't accept Canelo winning. The same thing will probably happen in the rematch even if Canelo wins more convincingly. No matter how badly Canelo beats G, you're gonna have G fanboys crying a storm screaming robbery like clockwork. You can't make this stuff up lol.

 

Little late to take the high road, you been insulting me for several pages now.

Nobody said she was banned, thats your strawman.

 

Oh thats rich. According to your twisted world view, the collective media and Bob Bennett, The Commision, are all butt hurt GGG fan boys and conspired together to falsely report Byrd would be suspended to generate fake controversy. Ladies and gentleman, enter the mind of a Canelo fan boy.

Nobody reported she would never work a fight again...straw +man.

 

I didn't use the kind of language you are using. You definitely threw the first punch and I simply countered and have been making you look silly, much like Canelo did to G and your still in denial about it. If I insulted you at all, it was much classier than how you are going about trying to insult me and surely had a much greater effect. You're just hurling trash at me and it's really cringeworthy man. Get your act together.

Banned/suspended/benched whatever you wanna call it. You're nitpicking. In no way was I using a strawman. You keep using that term like a broken record. You have no idea what the words you are using to describe what I'm saying even means lol. She worked a fight when it was reported she wouldn't.

 

Insults are insults, tool.

You deliberately interchanged "banned" for "suspended/bench" to alter the meaning of my article quote and claim a false victory. That is a Strawman.

 

I think that's a bit of a stretch to attribute that to what I'm saying. That's quite a misrepresentation but what can I expect of someone like you grasping at straws trying to backtrack?

I'm just going by what you said that : She has reportedly been suspended/benched from all fight scoring for the unforseeable future.

All scoring for the "un" forseeable future? Sounds like she wouldn't be working a fight for some time, if ever, based upon what you heard reported. It turns out she worked a fight. I thought I'd share that with you. Don't see why that would have provoked such a reaction out of you.

 

You're really not well in the head, are you? You're getting hot and bothered about what one guy who started a thread that you can't even link to, said?

Well I'm a GGG fan and I say Canelo and Oscar are both terrified of a rematch, which they are now trying to duck. I say that they realise that:

1) it's going to be much harder to get away with a crooked score card the second time round
2) GGG started slow the first time, he won't in the rematch
3) Canelo has nothing for GGG and he's going to face a more aggressive Golovkin in 2
4) Golovkin is going to go to the body this time and snap those ribs like twigs

Funny how Canelo and his team didn't want it in December, and that they're looking for "options" for May. That reminds me of those guys that get backhanded and they walk away blubbering about how they're going to "get" you "sometime". Like ... I'm right here, punk.

Yeeeahhh. Meanwhile, Oscar's dragging his feet and Loeffler has clearly had enough with his stalling tactics. Canelo's counting every minute he can age GGG with.

 

No. GGG will have to give Jacobs and Canelo the rematch and then beat Saunder to become the Undisputed World MW Champion.

 

That is exactly what you said, you nut. The media reported what Bob Bennett is on video saying, it was at a press conference, there are official statements. The media reported what officials went on record with. You claimed the media were butt hurt GGG fanboys that made it all up.

I havent back tracked on anything, all mighty conqueror of Strawmen.

 

LOL wow this just keeps getting more interesting by the minute. I think you're giving me a little bit too much credit though that I would deliberately do something like that. That's quite a theory, can't say I've ever heard anything like that before.

FYI I didn't give it that much thought. I don't see how there's all that much difference between banned/suspended/bench but don't let that stop you from jumping to whatever conclusion you want to jump to.

 

Why change it from the official comments to "banned"?

Why change "never work a major fight" to "never work a fight"?

These questions are rhetorical, its obvious why you do this time and time again.

Let me tell you, Strawmans only work in heated in person exchanges in front of a crowd, they do not work on message boards at all. Find a new hobby.