Dude, just read the articles. Sanders was ordered to fight Brewster right away, or lose his title. Which in itself smells fishy since iirc Tua was the mandatory that suddenly wasn't. Wlad couldn't go near him right away, then Sanders got the injury. It was just a shitstorm of occurrences that robbed my man Sanders of the chance of showcasing his talents again against somebody that didn't have a titanium chin like Vitali. Neither man ducked anything.
There was a rematch clause but not an IMMEDIATE rematch clause. I don't get what is so hard to not understand about that. Brewster/Sanders was going to purse bids literally two weeks after Sanders won the belt lol The WBO wanted it a done deal by 03/28, because Tua vs Rahman was 03/29. http://www.thesweetscience.com/arti...have-forgotten-the-most-important-rule-of-all
Could add this article to the pile: Corrie Sanders battered Wladimir Klitschko for the title earlier this month, David Tua was ranked WBO No.1. For whatever reason, the new champ was ordered to fight a mandatory within 120 days. However, instead of ordering Sanders to fight Tua, No.2 Lamon Brewster was given the shot. The WBO decided all this without consulting Team Tua and, understandably, the representatives of the No.1 contender petitioned the WBO to wait until their man fought Hasim Rahman on March 29. http://www.secondsout.com/usa-boxing-news/usa-boxing-news/heavyweight-title-row-rumbles-on
I understand the time line enough to point out that you were taking links from two different time periods and splicing them together as one. This isn't whats stated in the links you provided. Klitschko, who will travel to the US tomorrow with brother Vitali, wants immediate revenge, but cooler heads at the Hamburg headquarters of Universum Box Promotions are considering an interim fight against the likes a Fres Oquendo, John Ruiz or - surprisingly – the heavy-handed David Tua. Looks like he was instructed to avoid the rematch and take an interim fight against a bum instead. That bum fight came against Moli - a comeback opponent nowhere near as good as the ones that were mentioned. Im pointing out that he didn't take the rematch against a cherry pick gone wrong. Your links prove exactly that so I don't know what you are arguing against. Is is that he supposedly scheduled a rematch at a later date? That never happened and it doesn't disprove the fact that he fought an interim fight instead of setting the record straight with Sanders. If he wanted the rematch he wouldn't have fought that Moli bum.
Some people here just don't read or remember. My replies aren't often directed to these types, but to the new readers or others who don't know who our resident clowns are and might take their words initially at face value.
Can't get a better source of proof than from the mouth of Vitali himself. @24:20 This content is protected
Sanders wouldn't have been ordered to face Brewster if Wlad had exercised his rematch clause. This is all very straight forward and common sense backed up by facts will win the day.
A rematch clause is a rematch clause. Wlad had one on Sanders but he did not exercise it. You're trying to twist the meaning of a rematch clause to fit your narrative.
wow so wlad has a rematch clause and STILL RAN from it. There is no proof greater needed, cheers Kentucky for KO2ing your own argument, it will be well funny to see you write a reply pretending you are right again after singelhandedly wrecking your only leg to stand on.
Ping me when you have a point. Others make easy work of you. You are a hater type, and not a very good one at that.
I'll add some more to the pile. Corrie Sanders doesn’t know why Wladimir Klitschko never sought a rematch. Sanders, now 44, doesn’t understand why Klitschko never tried to avenge his knockout loss to him. In an article at Sportbox.ru, Sanders says “Yes, it would be nice to fight him [Wladimir] again. I do not know why he never wanted a rematch.” Sanders latter on went up against Wladimir’s big brother Vitali Klitschko http://www.boxingnews24.com/2010/06...hy-wladimir-klitschko-never-sought-a-rematch/