ChokLab Says This Clip Proves Louis Was The Same Size As Foreman and Norton

Bottom line he had beaten nobody of any consequence.

 

Joe Louis was six feet and one and a half inches tall this is from Joe Louis himself .

Do you think he was lying ? If so why? Don't you think he would be best positioned to know how tall he was?
I challenge you directly now to show one measurement that I have given in this thread that is :
1.Incorrect
2.An exaggeration

I made this thread specifically to rebut Choklabs LIE that Joe Louis was, and here below, I am quoting him directly

"at least the same size as Foreman and Norton".
He was not. I have provided Tale of the Tape links of the Foreman and Norton fight, and tale of the tape links of the Louis v Max Baer fight.
I took Choklab's own age criteria of a 24 years old Foreman when he was 217.5lbs to fight Frazier.
I then compared it to 24 years old Louis' weight for his fight with Jack Kraken .Louis scaled 181lbs for that fight.
That is a weight disparity of 36.5lbs!
If I wanted to do what you have accused me of I would have used Foreman's box rec height of 6'3.5".
I have not done so ,I have used the shorter measurement for Foreman of 6'3" .
This is exactly the opposite of what you have accused me of doing!
If you had half a brain you would have noticed that ,but your personal animosity towards me blinded you to the facts and as usual prevents you from ever exhibiting a semblance of objectivity.
I have no interest in predicting who would win a head 2 head matchup between Louis and either Foreman or Norton on this thread and have repeatedly said so.
My sole interest is in telling the truth, something you would not recognize if you fell over it!
I have absolutely no agenda in making this thread other than exposing Choklab's quote for what it was,a deliberate and cynical ,agenda driven lie!

If you believe this thread is a waste of time, why have you contributed to it?
You have taken Choklab's part because you once tried to get me banned here when your username was Mongoose.
When that did not work you left in high dudgeon, like a little boy who has had a goal disallowed for being offside.
In effect what you did was go into a sulk and say," Im taking my ball and going home".
Before you left you made disgusting personal remarks concerning paedophilia which I will not dignify by elaborating on.
You know what I think of you,because I told you ,there is no need to repeat it.
Then you crawled back here with your tail between your legs ,changing your user name in the process!

I offered you an olive branch which you ignored, fine I don't like you, or your content anyway.


Now I've told you your fortune and given some newer posters some background about your grubby history.And it was a pleasure to do so!"

Now I await your answer to my challenge ,show where I have exaggerated a single measurement on this thread?
I am waiting for your reply!

 

Malibran's record is 34-22-1 with 17ko losses , he had beaten no one of any stature when he fought Valdes. Valdes had beaten no one of any stature when he boxed Louis in an exhibition.

 

I don't do pretend. To answer you other comment Jersey Joe Walcott wasn't.Neither was Archie Moore.

 

What if ? Why waste time and space with what if's nonsense? Place it with your "pretend post,"it's infantile speculation.
I've proved my point with tale of tapes ,respective weights,Louis's own opinion, and I'm content with that.

This thread has gone 9 pages because "The Earth Is Flat Gang", can't be wrong and have to ascribe sinister motives to someone trying to show the truth .Ridiculous!