Can Wilder fans explain this to me please

Again, you basically ignored all my points. Good of the sports legacy and popularity? Screw it. Your old argument of popular opinion? Never mind, you were proven wrong. You just wanna see Wilder AJ. Even though it's not even clear at all it is the best fight in boxing right now, but would be if Wilder beat Parker first. I bet if you were old enough, you were jacking off to the prospect of Lewis Grant, moron.

 

It would be a major disappointment for Hearnshua if Wilder lost to Whyte.

 

A good fight is a good fight regardless of how many trinkets are on the line.

Would Canleo having the WBO belt have made the GGG fight any better? It would have made no difference at all. Also I didn't say it was the best fight in boxing, but the best in that division. Honestly couldn't give a **** about 'legacy' when the Parker fight can just happen afterwards anyway.

Including me only 16 people voted in your poll, so hardly proper source data is it?

Ultimately it boils down to 2 things here. 1 - You're obviously old and want some clamor back to the HW scene and dream of talking about legacies or whatever, so want it to be a huge event. 2- I don't want to wait for what I think is the better fight and what most people think is the better fight. Your poll doesn't directly address that, it's talking about how you want the belts collected.

 

God, your stupidity knows no ends, does it?

It's ONLY a good fight, or at least, only a great fight, if BOTH parties are roughly comparable. Right now they aren't. Parker, Wilder, Ortiz, Povetkin, they're all about comparable, a level below AJ. But if Wilder or Parker beat the other one? THEN they would be comparable to AJ. Then they would make a great fight vs AJ.

But you are too stupid to appreciate that.

Also, I had a similar poll years before on a similar topic. The fact is, my perspective is clearly the more appealing and the more logical one, your insanity cannot detract from it.

 

I'm not sure there's anyone out there that truly wants to watch Whyte vs Wilder instead of AJ vs Wilder.....

But it's the kind of fight Wilder needs to take if he actually wants to make any kind of financial demands.


Currently, whether you like it or not, Wilder doesn't bring 10% of the "Financial side" to the fight. So therefore, if Wilder truly wants the fight, he needs to understand his worth and that demanding anywhere close to "50/50" isn't going to happen.

 

AJ's best win is against a 41 year old coming off a loss and a 2 year layoff. It's a good win, but it's not a great win and it was very nearly a loss. The idea that this win means they all need to fight each other before fighting AJ is a strange one.

The fact you keep insulting my intelligence because I disagree with your opinion is a bit sad, really.

 

Only to your delusional, brain dead self, and those like you. Wlad is a million times a better win than anything on Wilders resume. If Wilder gets a legit big time win, like against Parker, it's different ( even though his next best 3 wins are probably better than any of Wilders). Until then, only brain dead idiots like you would argue they are comparable. As the polls show, most people prefer proven Champs face each other, rather than unproven. By your asinine logic, maybe AJ and Dubois should be facing each other next, since there is reason to believe he may be #2.

 

Hyperbole, insults and wittering. My dude, your autism is on fire this morning x

 

You just described your own sentence, and it was made in the context of defending a completely irrational position. Good job!

 

"I know you are but what am I?"
Embarrassed for you, mate.

 

Wow, again describing exactly what you are doing. It really takes a special kind of stupid to be you.

 

Poor attempt. Real shame. I'd expect this sort of patter in a Daily Mail comments section.

 

Aww, how cute, keep trying and one day you'll be able to construct a good argument!

 

AJ`s best win was against an ATG. What was Beyonce Wilder`s best win?

 

So now Wilder has to beat Whyte or Parker? Lmao.