Who Had the More Skill Mayweather Jnr Or Whittaker?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Nov 15, 2017.

  1. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2006
    Messages:
    97,655
    Likes Received:
    28,952
    Which of the two had the most innate talent.Floyd Mayweather Jnr, or Pernell Whittaker?
     
  2. Neebur

    Neebur Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2016
    Messages:
    939
    Likes Received:
    316
    Duran deserves a mention.
     
  3. Gudetama

    Gudetama Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2017
    Messages:
    1,034
    Likes Received:
    908
    Very even, I would say. I give the slight edge to Whitaker based on him being in a position (or rather, him being a bit more willing once in position) to deliver his own blows after his defensive wizardry. Skill-wise, they are the two most accomplished boxers I've seen in my own lifetime, I would suggest (I'm 36).
     
    The Morlocks and Brixton Bomber like this.
  4. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    52,605
    Likes Received:
    43,943
    Mayweather is extremely skilled but i have to lean toward Whitaker. He was ridiculous at times.
     
    Brixton Bomber likes this.
  5. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2010
    Messages:
    15,903
    Likes Received:
    7,631
    Mayweather for me, but barely.
    Every moment of every fight he was using some high level skill. Crazy combination of skill and consistency.

    Most untouched fighter to fight at his level.
    But Whitaker did some rediculous things in the ring. Mayweather always seemed to revere him.
     
  6. Gudetama

    Gudetama Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2017
    Messages:
    1,034
    Likes Received:
    908
    It's early days... But we're all roughly in agreement here, about them being close... Thats weird.... Who's gonna come and rip sh@* up?
     
  7. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    52,605
    Likes Received:
    43,943
    It'll be coming rest assured :lol:
     
    Gudetama likes this.
  8. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2012
    Messages:
    60,195
    Likes Received:
    80,270
    Whittaker.
     
  9. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2017
    Messages:
    7,816
    Likes Received:
    13,087
    Very even fight but possibly not much fun to watch, unless you like shadow boxing as entertainment. Punches landed stats would be interesting - I'm guessing around 10% success rate for both of them!
     
  10. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2009
    Messages:
    19,229
    Likes Received:
    257
    I actually think Mayweather was slightly more skilled. Prefer watching Whitaker fights though, while being a defensive wizard, he wasn't a safety first kind of boxer and willing to let his hands go.
     
    Clinton and Brixton Bomber like this.
  11. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2008
    Messages:
    28,072
    Likes Received:
    12,971
    Whitaker for me. The way he could dominate fighters like Nelson, Chavez and McGirt at every range swings it for me.
     
    Brixton Bomber likes this.
  12. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2011
    Messages:
    8,462
    Likes Received:
    2,812
    Slightly more skilled in which areas, I'm curious Bodhi
     
  13. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2011
    Messages:
    8,462
    Likes Received:
    2,812
    Whitaker for me. To me he had the most natural talent. Floyd relied more on his gameplan and strategy than Whitaker did.
     
    Brixton Bomber likes this.
  14. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2009
    Messages:
    19,229
    Likes Received:
    257
    Well, I think the difference comes from their approach to boxing. Whitaker was more natural talented, more creative in the ring and also more reliant on his physical athleticism. He would often come up with stuff that leaves you scratching your head.
    Mayweather not so much, he was more conservative in his approach, more textbook. And in this textbook more precise and accurate. He relied not as much on his athleticism and reflexes (albeit still important) as Whitaker. This allowed Mayweather to stay relevant and on top for longer. However, I also think he is easier to figure out than Whitaker.
     
    Brixton Bomber and KuRuPT like this.
  15. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2011
    Messages:
    8,462
    Likes Received:
    2,812
    Agree with pretty much everything here. Though I'm not sure it answered the question I posed, but it was a damn good answer so it's all good.