Takam, Stiverne, Pulev. Rate these guys.

Takam is the better fighter and harder one IF he actually tries.lol

Pulev is the smartest one but limited style and one motion of fighting of basic stepping forward and backwards in straight lines.

I think if you pressure both guys to actually try and fight back , Takam is the better fighter. If you coast in fights, Pulev excels.

Going by champion fights where both have to come to fight,I would say Takam. Not sure what he has left after previous fights but he took massive shots against Joshua .That could be his last hurrah?

 

Taky
pully
stevy

 

both knock him out at this point stiverne is done

 

Current versions?

Takam
Pulev







Stiverne


Peak versions would be pretty close, probably Pulev is the best of the lot.

 

Pulev
Takam



Stiverne

 

Better is subjective, but I have to wonder what with this new push to figure out who is king ****? What is the point in being the best loser? What are you looking for?

Look at the prestige Wlad and Fury enjoy even though those two are the only two since 686 BC to put on a HW championship match between a challenger and a champion of which both had previously missed an uppercut and landed on their own face. To a lot of people it's not a big deal, just a simple mistake. To me being the first champions to be such **** at basic technique they hit themselves is historically terrible. I mean they hit a record low for the whole 3k year old sport.

All Wlad had to do to be an ATG was not lose to fat, undersized, and old HWs who were never technical powerhouses or destructive power punchers their whole HW careers. That's it, he's no braggable win, he has no braggable technical prowess, and it didn't take much pro technique to get rid of him. Most hugs in a HW championship, avoided everyone he wasn't forced to fight, lost to b-side boxers, and hit himself. ATG though....because him were champ a long time.

That said I can't even begin to guess what the **** most people are looking at when someone judges "good" or "bad" at boxing as a whole.

 

I would beat Stiverne. This man doesn't belong in a boxing ring.

 

Pulev. I think Takam could do better than Chisora, but there really would not be much in it.

 

You made a thread because of someone who considers a win against the current Stiverne to be better than a win against Klitschko.

 

In order, at their best: Pulev, Takam, Stiverne

Takam's probably the best today.

 

The poll is a joke and the TS is a blatant liar. And he's protecting Joshua at all costs. Hilarious lol. He doesn't need to see them fight. He already knows who is better. So the next time I bet on a winner, I'm going to BCS. He knows who ranks higher and who would beat who lmao.