Wladimir Klitschko v Lennox Lewis

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by LD Boxer-Puncher, Nov 27, 2017.


Wladimir Klitschko v Lennox Lewis

Poll closed Nov 27, 2018.
  1. Klitschko by UD

    4 vote(s)
    11.1%
  2. Klitschko by SD/MD

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. Klitschko by KO/TKO

    1 vote(s)
    2.8%
  4. Draw

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  5. Lewis by UD

    2 vote(s)
    5.6%
  6. Lewis by SD/MD

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  7. Lewis by KO/TKO

    29 vote(s)
    80.6%
  1. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,030
    Sep 22, 2010
    its not about not liking its about, as you said "weak time for the HW division".


    u gave me the answer yourself.
     
  2. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,355
    Jun 29, 2007
    You would have to assume this fight could only have happened when Wlad was the WBO champion in the early 2000's. Whomever lands their best first should win. I favor Lewis slightly because I think he's the more relaxed and confident of the two in the early rounds, but if Lennox thought Wlad was another McCall or Rhaman, he's getting knocked out.
     
  3. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    61,660
    82,135
    Aug 21, 2012
    Your OCD Klitschko-hate schtick was old years ago. You and Dino make it impossible to have a normal conversation about the Klitschkos anymore.
     
  4. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,030
    Sep 22, 2010
    obviously u will need a lot of time to pick up your toys, i'll leave u to calm down.
     
  5. LD Boxer-Puncher

    LD Boxer-Puncher Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,796
    1,192
    May 10, 2017
    Did I?

    I was talking about the division, not them.
    They were head and shoulders above it
     
  6. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,030
    Sep 22, 2010
    totally, except for the middle rank guys who easily pasted them out.

    yup u gave me all the answer needed, thanks, move on.
     
  7. LD Boxer-Puncher

    LD Boxer-Puncher Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,796
    1,192
    May 10, 2017
    The same way Buster Douglas pasted Mike Tyson out? Or Oliver McCall - Lennox Lewis? etc etc...
    They also aren't elite fighters then, is that right?
     
  8. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,030
    Sep 22, 2010
    u know the answer, one off for tyson.


    u know the answer for lewis, he beat them.

    In view of the fact that you know this, and that you know K bros ran in gibbering fear from their losses - why did you raise points you knew to be fails?

    let me know you advanced failed points knowlingly. thx.
     
  9. LD Boxer-Puncher

    LD Boxer-Puncher Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,796
    1,192
    May 10, 2017
    A one off for Tyson? How about how he lost again, again, again? Lost most big fights he was ever involved in. You can't pick and choose when it suits you.

    Wladimir beat Brewster, guessing you didn't know that, rather than choosing to ignore it?

    Let's be honest, Wlad could have lost once and you'd be saying the same thing.
     
  10. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,030
    Sep 22, 2010
    ahh right BIG fights - ie against elites - eand elites are those who only lose to other elites.

    You've not advanced an argument, unless u r referring to fights that washed up tyson lost. Are you mentioning them?




    he beat retired inujred brewster yes, years later, you choosing to ignore that? yes u r.

    if he had even several losses to elites, then he would have a case for elitedom. But he doesnt. He has several losses to middlers.

    The only honest thing here is you admitting wlad dont fit the definition, but that may take time.
     
  11. Knights107

    Knights107 Member Full Member

    450
    211
    Aug 13, 2015
  12. LD Boxer-Puncher

    LD Boxer-Puncher Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,796
    1,192
    May 10, 2017
    I think you know you're lying to yourself deep down, there's not much point on me keeping on repeating what you already know.

    What elite fights did Mike Tyson win against peak elites as you call it? He lost 6 fights, you think he doesn't have to win any of those to be elite, yet you think Wlad has to lose only once.
    Your criteria is being reshaped to suit you. They're allowed to lose once to a non elite, because that suits Mike Tyson and not Wlad, and they're allowed to lose 5 more as long as they're against good fighters (and you add in the past it card to help too) again, because it suits Tyson and not Wlad.
    All clear indicators of someone who doesnt want to admit something.

    You know what the honest thing is already, as I've said
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  13. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    61,660
    82,135
    Aug 21, 2012
    Debating with Herol? Good luck ... :eusa_whistle:
     
  14. LD Boxer-Puncher

    LD Boxer-Puncher Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,796
    1,192
    May 10, 2017
    I'm finished now, him and his friend are the only two on the forum who would probably argue that Wladimir wasn't an elite heavyweight, that should spell it out to them clearly enough.
    Only they know why they do it.
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  15. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    61,660
    82,135
    Aug 21, 2012
    There's a theory about a Wlad lookalike and their mums ... but we won't go into that.
     
    LD Boxer-Puncher likes this.