The Louis that fought Rocky was not shot.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by reznick, Nov 27, 2017.


  1. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,901
    7,643
    Mar 17, 2010
    Damn. Manny Stewart quotes are taken pretty seriously around here.

    I just watched the interview. He doesn't say that Rocky is not in his top 10....
     
    choklab likes this.
  2. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,901
    7,643
    Mar 17, 2010
    I don't see why we have to compare Foreman to Louis. Foreman is not the benchmark for being good when old. He surpasses the benchmark by quite a distance. Falling under him does not make you a shot old fighter, so the whole argument seems silly to me.

    I do wonder though, how many of the 25 or so exhibitions Louis fought in 1950 would be million dollar pro fights in the 80's?
     
    choklab likes this.
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,716
    30,656
    Jun 2, 2006
    Does it say he is?
    The point is you cant cherry pick quotes from the same source to suit your agenda.
    ps.It's Steward.
     
    Seamus likes this.
  4. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,716
    30,656
    Jun 2, 2006
    Nothing wrong with the underlined.
     
    reznick likes this.
  5. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,901
    7,643
    Mar 17, 2010
    He doesn't say either way. But he also had some criticisms for others in his top 10. So it's unclear.
    I didn't pull the quote. My argument is actually similar to yours. You can't use him to suit an agenda and dismiss him when it doesn't.
     
  6. The Kentucky Cobra

    The Kentucky Cobra Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,576
    2,517
    Jan 9, 2017
    Louis was not at his best against Marciano, which is agreeable.

    When people use "shot" to describe a fighter the implication is they are so far removed from their best they are no longer any good fighters in general, little if any credit is deserved.

    Was Louis so far past his best he could be described as "shot" Nonsense, he was active, fighting frequently and winning against good to solid comp, in great shape, and considered a leading contender.

    Also, consider the extreme weight discrepancy Marciano was at. Its a great win.
     
    choklab and reznick like this.
  7. Contro

    Contro Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,882
    4,720
    Jun 7, 2016
    Louis of the marciano fight could still beat somewhat decent opposition.

    Tyson beat a decent string of guys before Lewis including 2 good wins in Botha and Golota but got crushed against the champ.

    Holmes beat Mercer, gave Holyfield a decent fight and almost beat McCall several years after losing the title.

    Holyfield scraped by Rahman before getting picked apart by toney

    A champion can be far past his best and still beat some decent fighters. But that doesnt change the fact that he is no where near what he was. It just means that the remnants of what once was are enough to get by some fighters
     
    mcvey and choklab like this.
  8. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,901
    7,643
    Mar 17, 2010
    Yeah. I don't think "shot" means "not prime."
    It means they are a worn out, broken fighter that lacks competitiveness.
    Which I don't think Louis was at all.
     
  9. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,716
    30,656
    Jun 2, 2006
    Well its in the title of your thread.Anyone else used the term or saying he was?
     
  10. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,306
    53,825
    Feb 11, 2005
    We are discussing degrees and context here. How far gone was Louis for the type of fighter Louis once was, is the question. For what he once was, a brutal, finishing combo puncher with great balance and trip hammer reflexes (note: homage to our old Burt)... he was shot. For a guy who had enough ring IQ and muscle memory to one-hand his way thru middling opposition, he was functional.
     
    mcvey likes this.
  11. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,716
    30,656
    Jun 2, 2006
    The weight discrepancy would be a factor if it was a good weight for Louis
    This is a reasonable assessment imo.
     
  12. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,901
    7,643
    Mar 17, 2010
    Yeah, I think Louis being shot for the Rocky fight is a commonly known theme.
    Which I think most people in this thread understand, which is why it is being discussed for 10 pages.
     
  13. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,901
    7,643
    Mar 17, 2010
    Disagree.
    I think "shot" is a low baseline measurement.
    Not the distance between peak and average.

    I've always assumed that's how it was universally understood.
     
    Last edited: Dec 1, 2017
  14. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,306
    53,825
    Feb 11, 2005
    If he wasn't "shot" he was damn close. I am not interested in semantics. He owed a ton of money but didn't dare fight again to recoup his losses. The public had lost all belief or interest in him. Perhaps there was a reason for this.
     
  15. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,676
    7,669
    Dec 31, 2009
    How “shot” was Lennox Lewis against Vitali Klitschko?

    It was his last fight wasn’t it?

    Lennox was past prime but still beating rated fighters.