Fair play to parker

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by kevinreid001, Dec 7, 2017.


  1. kevinreid001

    kevinreid001 Punchdrunk101 Full Member

    2,841
    966
    Nov 1, 2012
    Too often we see fights not happen or ducks for whatever reason but fair play to parker his tweet to Joshua was hilarious. The guy clearly wants fight and is happy as a champion only a 35 percent split and a rematch. He clearly chasing fight and i do think he beliebe can win startin root for The guy . The haters will say he gettin his highest payday even at 35 percent so what he is a champ he has a belt and wants fight in a age where too many fighters make bold statement eant fight best never back them up or price themselves out.at very worst if aj lost the rematch would sell like crazy put it in clause if he lost rematch hav be 50 50

    Even at 65 percent what u think Joshua be earning 7 mayb 8 million.?? With a rematch clause also. The i dont box money tweet class puts hearn Joshua a position to clarify why don't accept a good deal how much greed need to be , Joshua will like most on here beliebe parker is easiest fight out of say wilder fury mayb even povetkin so why not take it good payday extra belt. Is it dowm pure greed ???
     
  2. kojak

    kojak Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,916
    2,960
    Apr 22, 2012
    For me it's greed pure and simple. It's not like AJ isn't set for life already now either.

    It annoys me when people start talking about what a fighters worth, if your going to go down that line then just scrap belts and status, because it's just de'valueing them and the sport otherwise.

    Parker has won his belt the hard way, as a fellow champion 35% is more then fair imo.

    All this nonsense is what's going to stop fights being made, if Hearn is that confident just take the fight for godsake!
     
    BEATDOWNZ likes this.
  3. pow

    pow Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,841
    3,989
    Apr 26, 2014
    I have to disagree. He won a vacant belt against someone who probably isn't even top 15 in an organisation who's ranking is a complete joke. Defended against Hugie Fury and Cojanu. Boxing is a business and 30% is more than generous. He would be earning peanuts in any other fight and should be thankful to Hearn and matchroom for the life changing opportunity. If they push there luck too far they may miss out as Joshua has weaknesses.
     
    S.K, stittyb, tdf1974 and 1 other person like this.
  4. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    92,974
    27,712
    Jan 18, 2010
    For me it's about preventing to set a precedent.
    They already massively overpaid that guy that walked the earth like a god, who was holding the IBF belt at the time. Now people want them to massively overpay Parker too.
    Everybody knows what happens next. "But you paid [insert name] [insert huge amount], and I'm better so I want at least [insert insane amount]".
    This will happen every next fight, and fans will hop on that bandwagon.
    Overpaying one guy is tricky. Repeating it is very bad for your future income.
     
    S.K, N17 and stittyb like this.
  5. kojak

    kojak Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,916
    2,960
    Apr 22, 2012
    I get what your saying Pow, but why should he be thankful, he's a world champion and it's him whos actually trying to make the fight. When I hear stuff like that, it makes it sound like he's been offered a handout he should take.

    This is where it starts to cross and blur the lines of being a sport and a business to purely just business.

    It's now just going along the lines of greed, reverting away from the sporting aspect. I just hope the fight actually gets made, I just want to see the champions face each other.
     
  6. Scyson

    Scyson Active Member banned Full Member

    751
    467
    Oct 14, 2017
    55-25 split. Winner takes the extra 20%. If both sides are so confident then why not?
     
    S.K and BEATDOWNZ like this.
  7. liger1992

    liger1992 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,172
    1,360
    Mar 29, 2015
    AJ being set for life is irrelevant. His not in the business to make sure everyone else is looked after.

    Floyd made a difference to plenty of opponents lives giving them there biggest paydays. Could he of paid them more, yes he could of but why should he? He had he own self worth as does AJ and its unrealistic to think they should be made to take less money simply because they are wealthy already.
     
    S.K, Beez and Robney like this.
  8. kojak

    kojak Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,916
    2,960
    Apr 22, 2012
    If you forget the monetary side for a second, what I'm trying to say, is the belt actually worth anything in negotiations from Parkers side?

    Because if there not, what's the point in even having one, if it's solely going to be about the fighter who has the better following.

    Do we get to a point where promoters start to tell us more and more a fighter is bigger then titles?

    I'm more concerned that more and more big fights get delayed, or don't get made due to the above happening and we get the equivalent of Molina / Taken opponents on PPV constantly rather than the top fighters fighting each other.
     
  9. nurological

    nurological Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,510
    10,690
    May 25, 2012
    Whats sad is the fact this is a boxing forum and there is more discussion about percentages and splits than the actual fight.
     
    BEATDOWNZ likes this.
  10. RoughD

    RoughD Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,687
    99
    Jun 29, 2006
    Couldn't agree more

    **** the money

    It's ruining boxing

    Greedy ****s
     
    BEATDOWNZ likes this.
  11. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,565
    Nov 24, 2005
    35% isn't overpaying.
    The man has a recognized heavyweight championship belt.

    AJ gets 65%, Parker gets 35%. Both title holders. The precedent there is that the title-holder with less current proven box office appeal gets a 35% slice in a unification match. I've yet to see anyone explain what's wrong with that.
    (Even a mandatory challenger is supposed to get a fair slice, about 30%.)
     
    Sugar 88, mcvey and Jackfazz like this.
  12. ashishwarrior

    ashishwarrior I'm vital ! Full Member

    34,379
    11,866
    Apr 19, 2010
    Aj should just give him a flat fee same with wilder and make it at wembeley
    And drag it out as long as possible
    Just like Floyd and hoe
    Good bussiness move
    Kills boxing but who cares about the sport side of boxing
    Its the business side everyone seems to like
    Sad but true
     
  13. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,565
    Nov 24, 2005

    Of course the belt is worth something. Especially at the current time when there's no clear established champion at the top of the division, like Wladimir was.

    This is what people fail to take into account.
    Parker might not yet be a box office fighter himself but his belt is worth something to ALL fighters, or ought to be.
     
  14. pow

    pow Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,841
    3,989
    Apr 26, 2014
    This pro ranks are boxing entertainment. It's part of the game. Amateur boxing is the pure sport version.
     
  15. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,565
    Nov 24, 2005
    That's not necessarily true.
    It's wrong to assume another opportunity couldn't come along for Parker within months.
    Anything can happen.

    Maybe the shady money Russians pay him massive money to come to Moscow for a fight with Povetkin.
    Maybe Tyson Fury comes to New Zealand or Australia to face Parker.
    Maybe Anthony Joshua loses to someone unexpectedly and comes knocking on Parker's door as a challenger !
    Maybe Wladimir decides to come back and test himself against Parker.
    A new contender with box office can come along at any moment. That's what makes a belt valuable, more valuable than simple numbers the current champion has generated.

    Parker's taking a risk if he turns down the AJ fight for, say 30% because that's a lot of money, but it's not a definite net loss in the long run if he does. If he keeps winning he'll end up with a big payday sooner or later.
    35% is the price he's set.