Prime Joe Louis vs Corrie Sanders

I'm forced to agree with that.

Oy, vey. I'll try to forget that you said that, however.

 

Louis by stoppage.

 

thats presuming he was good enough to get a title shot yeh?

which he wasnt when active and prime. but magically he becomes able to when 38 yeears old retired and marymcflied back to 1930s?

 

I reckon Louis' short, compact combinations would knock Sanders out; maybe with a hairy moment or 2 along the way. I reckon it would last 5-6 rounds.

 

Wow, you're really a stupid bozo, aren't you? 4 years and you're still saying the exact same stupid **** in every.single.Sanders.thread.

Idiocy like yours is rare.

Not only don't you realise that your dumb argument is exactly that - a dumb argument that doesn't mean anything significant - but you persist in rattling on with it as though you had uncovered a point of monumental importance. It baffles me as to how you think that pointing out that Sanders was one of the most avoided fighters in boxing could possibly irritate me? The only thing that irritates me is how people like you, that are barely smart enough to remember the breathing sequence, are able to make it on here and post.

FFS, try something new.

You have the IQ of an average houseplant.

Your God-awful spelling and grammar makes me vomit, too. Most of the time I can't even make out what you're saying, and neither can anybody else. It's like you fell off the Stupid Tree and still have a branch wedged up your rectum.

Even in fields that you ** claim ** to be some sort of authority ( ) I regularly smash your face in with the minimum of effort. Tell us again how Vitali's rotator cuff injury couldn't possibly go numb and how he's a liar again?

Are you a masochist?

Do you derive sexual pleasure from being beaten and humiliated?

Dude, you're stinking up the forum.

 

Louis had fists like lightning

 

so you wrote all that but no actual argument in reply? flop mate.

 

u fail

 

meh, Sanders was bigger, probably faster, hit harder, didn't telegraph his punches as much, busier, more aggressive, threw straighter punches than Louis' opponents. He'd probably win.

 

Louis fought people who were bigger than Sanders, people who were faster, possibly people who hit harder, people who were superior technicians, people who were busier, and people who were more aggressive.

Sanders is just a guy with one good win at the end of the day.

If Wlad lost to him, then that is Wlad's problem.

Don't try to make it Louis's problem

 

Janitor, you know damn well Sanders was better than Galento and James. That is for certain. I don't care that James was the Lineal champ, that came against subpar competition imo, and his career record speaks for itself. Both at their best, Sanders sparks out James easily. This fight is, the best version of Sanders, not the inconsistent one. The best one, gives Louis a hard time, as lesser fighters did, though I think Louis would still win in the end.

 

At the end of the day, Sanders is a fighter with one good win.

You can't get past that.

Yes he beat a developing version of Wlad, but so did Ross Purity, and so did Lamon Brewster.

People are building him up to be some head to head monster, based on one very impressive win, which two other fighters were able to match.

Are you perhaps being a bit premature here?

 

Brutal. I felt that !

 

There you have it ! Very winnable fight for Sanders imo too

 

Its an execution in Sanders favour the more I think about it !