Bowker has some nice wins at bantam, but he moved up the weight before he could really establish dominance. I kind of wonder if he and Dixon are in the same boat.
4-0 in world title fights, beat two other guys from the list and was champion for two years. Got a bit more done I think.
Definitely. Always the case i'd say. There are always about 12 guys in for 6 slots. Bottom ten is always soft wherever you stop over 20.
But one of those victories, over Palmer, occurred at featherweight. Should he get credit at bantam for work done above that class? Also, Jimmy Walsh's work at bantam seems a bit spotty upon closer inspection. Stanley seems a good win, and yeah he looked on his way to beating Atell in the fight where he gains recognition at bantam, but what else is there?
It was a bit wild west, sure, if you want to. In the end, he's done more lineage and more guys who were placed under consideration here than most of the guys he shares a tier with. I can't agree with this. Attell, Stanely (beat Moran, Bowker, Palmer, Ledoux, NWS draw with Burns), O'Toole (Abe Attell, Dwyer, Wolgast), Moore (not the one on this list but another very good fighter) he's for sure about the fifty. Of the ten or so champions before Herman, there are a few with a good case but his is one of the stronger ones, he beat a couple of lineal champs. Just the other Attell brother thing is all that bothers me, but all these guys are flawed.
What I ended up with: 01 - Ruben Olivares 02 - Manuel Ortiz 03 - Eder Jofre 04 - Fighting Harada 05 - Pete Herman 06 - Lionel Rose 07 - Pal Moore 08 - Kid Williams 09 - Al Brown 10 - Carlos Zarate 11 - Rafael Herrera 12 - Bud Taylor 13 - Joe Lynch 14 - Johnny Coulon 15 - Chucho Castillo 16 - Lou Salica 17 - Terry McGovern 18 - Sixto Escobar 19 - Jeff Chandler 20 - Jimmy Carruthers 21 - Frankie Burns 22 - Vic Toweel 23 - Lupe Pintor 24 - Alfonso Zamora 25 - Rafael Marquez 26 - Orlando Canizales 27 - Pedlar Palmer 28 - Jose Medel 29 - Jose Beccera 30 - Alphonse Halimi 31 - Robert Cohen 32 - Midget Wolgast 33 - Pancho Villa 34 - Enrique Pinder 35 - Jimmy Wilde 36 - Rodolfo Martinez 37 - Abe Goldstein 38 - Newsboy Brown 39 - Joe Bowker 40 - Alan Rudkin 41 - Raul Perez 42 - Happy Lora 43 - Pete Sanstol 44 - Jorge Lujan 45 - Hozumi Hasegawa 46 - Veeraphol Sahaprom 47 - Mario D'Agata 48 - Bernardo Caraballo 49 - Jesus Pimentel 50 - Charley Phil R0senburg
Agree that Zarate is too low. Looking forward to the explanation of that one! No argument with the top 3 though.
Zarate's barely top ten material in my opinion. Far and away the shallowest resume in the top 10. Definitely guys in the clutch below with better wins, never lineal. Honestly, I'd only question if he's too high, never too low. Range is 9-15.
I'm certain you know much more about the bantams than I do, but still questions popped up. I don't see Pintor being in a lower tier than Zarate. He beat him. (I understand a lot of folks didn't agree with the decision, but I did). Frankly, I think Zarate is a bit overrated because of his statistical record. Even more of a question, though. Why is Jose Becerra tier V and Alphonse Halimi tier III. Becerra KO'd Halimi twice in championship fights. I don't see that Halimi did enough elsewhere to overcome something like that. No Raton Macias? Carruthers might be a bit low.
I do agree with you about Zarate, but I also feel that Pintor got lucky with the cards there, which does matter to me. Sandovl and Davilla are very nice supplementary wins tbf, and it's a nice title reign. But yeah, I see Zarate well above him for, as you say, statistical reasons. That said, as you can see above, the reaction is generally one of disagreement with his being too low. I have ranked Zarate lower than he generally appears here, for reasons you touch upon. As you can see from the above, they ended up ranked back to back. No, third best win just isn't very good. He did "miss out" rather than get dumped though. I could see him at #50 without losing any sleep, but Tony Olivera, Bushy Graham or Jimmy Walsh could all fit too. #20 is OK I think. Burns could be above him or he could be above Escobar.
McGrain Sorry about the Becerra thing. I just responded to your original post w/o reading your later revision.
Yes, it's no problem. The way the thread is staged is confusing. It's just because it's a process it ends up that way. And I don't want to replace the end result with the final list because it's unfair to all the posts that were made on the OP. I'll be doing flyweights soon, you should look in on that from the start.
It's your list. I know nothing about Pal Moore and wondered HTF he got so high? I see he beat Herman a couple of times ,I'm unable to access Box Rec despite e mailing them several times,were their fights at Bantam?