P4P is a measure of performance. Canelo out-performed Triple G on Sept 16th. Yes it was a draw but Triple G were given a gift draw for trying hard and throwing more punches. The fighter who landed the impressive eye-catching scintillating punches were Saul Canelo Alvarez. P4P is really more about punch efficiency and all around skill. Triple G looked limited vs Canelo. He found it hard to hit Canelo clean, he was gunshy about throwing body shots due to Canelo's superb defense. If you rate the two fighters performances, there's no doubt that Canelo had the better P4P performance.
Pretty good but I think Thurman way too high. Kovalev, Garcia > Thurman. Just an opinion of course. Kovalev arguably beat Ward in the first fight. Thurman's best win is either D Garcia or Porter. Neither were high on anybody's P4P list.
On it??? Like on your pole? There is nothing wrong feeling that way towards him as long as you dont use it as a secret biased weapon against members that dont feel the same as you towards Wilder. And dont think i'm the only one that notices how you so often post right after me you freaking pervert.
These lists are all over the place but in their way these things are so arbitrary it's so hard to argue at times. People rate potential and accomplishments to different standards, which I think is the main thing to skew these lists. I would struggle to put AJ in there though, I think that's a little difficult to justify because I don't personally think a 41 year old Wlad off a 2 year layoff and a loss is a 'great' win. A great name and a great fight but not a great win. Plus it was very nearly an L. But that's the thing, people value criteria totally different so there isn't really a right answer to these things. I think the winners of the WBSS probably need to work their way in, although Usyk seems to be in most anyways