...is Saunders the best middleweight not named Golovkin since Pirog?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, Dec 16, 2017.


Is he?

Poll closed Mar 26, 2018.
  1. Yes

    49.4%
  2. No

    50.6%
  1. shoe

    shoe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,560
    563
    Dec 2, 2013
    cause Jacobs has reach, good movement and jab also. What sets them apart is i think he has more power than Saunders, and versatility. He could fight a different way if necessary, and rozier is no fool ala Lemieux and his camp.
     
    IntentionalButt likes this.
  2. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,356
    83,212
    Nov 30, 2006
    Whose footwork is better IYO?
     
  3. shoe

    shoe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,560
    563
    Dec 2, 2013
    i'd rate the gyspy shuffle right below Lomanchenko insofar as creating ideal range and angles. I'm not saying it would be easy for Jacobs over Saunders but he gets it done imo. Another factor is Jacobs can turn southpaw if strategy warrants.
     
    IntentionalButt likes this.
  4. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,356
    83,212
    Nov 30, 2006
    Good point. Have we ever seen BJS switch to orthodox?
     
  5. FrankinDallas

    FrankinDallas FRANKINAUSTIN

    29,973
    36,753
    Jul 24, 2004
    GGG knows how to cut off a ring and would do so against BJS.
    Canelo wouldn't try to follow around like a dummy (like Lemoo did), that
    plays right into Saunders hand. Canelo would make Saunders come to him,
    then drill him like he drilled Kirkland. End of story.
    I think Jacobs has the skills to beat Saunders as well, but other then those three,
    Saunders is just below them at #4.
     
  6. Grime Rockstar

    Grime Rockstar Member banned Full Member

    360
    224
    Dec 13, 2017
    people need to realise now Saunders is the real deal, He's not just a cocky clown outside of the ring, he's a serious player in the division.
     
  7. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,356
    83,212
    Nov 30, 2006
    Sounds like another gypsy boxer..
     
  8. STEPHEN1990

    STEPHEN1990 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,124
    1,160
    Aug 22, 2017
    I think people are going overboard he fought lemiuex the same lemiuex that golovkin already smashed up and now he beats all the champs no way he beats golovkin imo golovkin would rush him cut the ring off give him no where to run and make him work non stop and he proved he doesn't care if he misses let's see Saunders stay that close when he has a huge puncher with great footwork and who is great at cutting off the ring
     
    mirkofilipovic likes this.
  9. KiwiMan

    KiwiMan Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,404
    14,596
    Feb 28, 2016
    Unfortunately that fight isn't likely to happen, Jacobs is with Hearn and BJS with Warren.

    Both are also hoping to get Canelo/GGG next without necessarily fighting each other first.
     
  10. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,024
    27,639
    Jul 26, 2004
    Said this in another thread but I just got to see the highlights from last nights fight and I expected BJS to look better going by the talk on here last night. The result was awesome and speaks for itself, cant knock that, but he didnt look quite like how I was expecting, and my previous picks of him to beat Jacobs and Canelo will have to be re-evaluated when I get to watch the full fight. Going by the little I saw of him, those are still competitive fights (though I would still pick Saunders).

    So I still rate him the best middle since Pirog, minus G. And would probably pick him to beat Canelo and Jacobs.... but he didnt look as good as I was expecting and those are risky fights that I could see both DJ and Canelo actually winning. Also do not count out Charlo.

    Fun times at middleweight.
     
  11. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,591
    17,669
    Apr 3, 2012
    Saunders hasn't proven he can hang with Golovkin like Jacobs and Canelo have. Andrade might be better head to head also.

    He had a very good win last night, but Lemieux is one of those guys who looks great against opponents he can hit and bad against slick boxers. I give Lemieux's team credit for not matching him against guys who can exploit him unless it's for big money and a title.
     
  12. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    36,573
    29,133
    Feb 25, 2015
    No not really I think he's just another one of those guys who went deep into his lair hiding out from Golovkin. As we all know the current GGG were are seeing right now is not the GGG we saw 3-4 years ago. It was during that time when Saunders said to Eubank Jr. "Golovkin knocks out me and you both on the same night". So if that is the single biggest threat to GGG besides Pirog then either we have underrated GGG, overrated the top of the MW division or both.

    I'd say Jacobs is better. Canelo maybe. Also, I wouldn't rule out a pre GGG knockout version of Matthew Macklin to beat Saunders. And I would make Martin Murray a live dog as well.
     
  13. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    36,573
    29,133
    Feb 25, 2015
    If I was GGG's trainer/promoter/manager I would personally advise that he not fight BJS right now. By the time a potential fight were to happen GGG would be at least 36 years old. Which is old for any fighter, but for a pressure fighter that is simply ancient.

    The guy looks like he's carrying two lead boots in the ring right now. He never was quick of hand or foot, but now he's severely "undersped" for lack of a better word. Canelo's not even the slickest guy around, but looked so much younger and quicker than GGG did.

    Golovkin is vulnerable and ready to be taken out hard. Well perhaps not taken out, the chin is awesome, but BJS could school him. He's already looked underwhelming his last two fights. And while Jacobs is pretty good I never rated Canelo. I still don't. He's a no power, no stamina having weight drainer who bullied smaller opponents. GGG should have taken him out and I have little doubt that he would have years ago. Neither did Oscar which is why the belt was vacated.

    Back to the point. Is Saunders really the best MW since GGG and Pirog. I don't think so, but I would recommend that GGG stay away from him.
     
  14. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,650
    13,047
    Apr 1, 2007
    I can't get too excited over a guy who's best win is one equaled by a very old, one foot in the grave Joachime Alcine (Remember him? Probably not) many years ago.

    Saunder's still hasn't done anything exceptional or particularly noteworthy, in my opinion. There are special fighters present in the sport at the moment, special talents. But I personally don't think he's one of them and it's more indicative of the recent poor talent pool in the middleweight division.
     
  15. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,356
    83,212
    Nov 30, 2006
    He doesn't have the one big wow-factor merit-badge, no, but a lot of consistency of better-than-mediocre quality. Lee, Spike, Lemieux, Eubank Jr., Monroe Jr., Blandamura, Ryder, Blackwell... all varying flavors of the "good enough to content for a Euro belt to maybe fringe world class" spectrum. Sometimes a single A level win in a sea of garbage can be flukey and lead to people getting overrated en masse by an incautious and impatient public (see: Nicholas Walters, Julius Indongo) when really a much better indicator of staying potential is a lengthy run of form against B level guys. Even lacking an elite scalp his resume is already among the best @ middle today.
     
    Russell likes this.