...is Saunders the best middleweight not named Golovkin since Pirog?

Ya man definitely hard to say. The Groves fight will tell a lot but.... from the little Ive seen of the two face to face, Eubank looks suprisingly undersized there. Eubanks big, so thought hed fit in a bit better but the little I saw Groves makes him look a bit small.

Anyways, rooting for Eubank to win the tourney and hopefully come back down. I can see him being a diva if he wins though and saying that now people have to come to him in his new weight. Meh.

 

You're by far one of the most mind-numbingly idiotic posters on this site, you really need to get a FAR better perspective of this sport, because the skewed prism you're viewing it through is covered with soap scum and riddled with cracks and divots. Most of the time you come across as kind of.... insane.

 

I highly doubt Murata beats Saunders, not a great style match up there, Derevyanchenko would give him a run for his money, and since Charlo has already CLEARLY lost to a slick southpaw in Trout, with questionable whiskers, what makes you think he could beat a slicker southpaw who's harder to look good against with solid whiskers? Saunders is an absolute nightmare for the evil twin.

By the way @IntentionalButt Did you ever get around to watching Charlo-Trout? I've caught quite a bit of flack for scoring it 118-110 Trout, somewhat of a trollish scorecard but still very plausible, that being said, Trout won the match easily IMO, probably more along the lines of 116-112 though. Pinoy had it 116-112 as well and thought Austin was robbed. If you haven't you should give it a watch and score it.