George Foreman vs. Earnie Shavers.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by VG_Addict, Jan 1, 2018.


  1. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,570
    12,001
    Sep 21, 2017
    Shavers also stopped Norton as well. Sometimes fighters lose/do worse vs a lesser fighter and then make a spectacular performance against a superior fighter. For various reasons.
     
  2. Combatesdeboxeo_

    Combatesdeboxeo_ Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,991
    1,141
    Nov 19, 2016
    Norton was a total shot when he fought shavers.
    (And now tell me that shavers would ko even prime norton etc...)it is speculation and nothing more. What he did is beating a shot fighter.period
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.
  3. Cecil

    Cecil Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,102
    5,229
    Mar 22, 2015
    Foreman and pretty early.
    I don't think Earnie can take what George would throw at him.
    George was also bigger and more durable, Earnie would have to get lucky.
     
  4. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,350
    45,537
    Apr 27, 2005
    I wouldn't say Norton was "total shot". Declined, aged and past prime but not total shot.
     
    Smoochie likes this.
  5. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,427
    11,890
    Mar 19, 2012
    On the other hand Shavers went 15 with Ali and a case could be made he deserved the decision. Foreman couldn't go 8 with Ali.
     
  6. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,255
    6,542
    Jan 22, 2009
    Earnie wouldn't get past the 2nd round. George's chin was light years better.
     
  7. Combatesdeboxeo_

    Combatesdeboxeo_ Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,991
    1,141
    Nov 19, 2016
    With the "little" detail that shavers fought a zombie ali in 1977 and foreman lost against a very good version of ali in 1974. 74 foreman stops 77 ali,i bet my house on it
     
    Smoochie and swagdelfadeel like this.
  8. Combatesdeboxeo_

    Combatesdeboxeo_ Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,991
    1,141
    Nov 19, 2016
    In 1979 norton was finished,he had only 3 fights more and then he retired plus he looked crap in all these fights.
    A ****ing draw with ledoux.. It says all
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.
  9. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    19,237
    20,846
    Jul 30, 2014
    Shavers chin (contrary to popular belief) actually was a very good one. His stamina was the problem. Though I agree Foreman pummels him.
     
  10. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,350
    45,537
    Apr 27, 2005
    The flip side is he basically matched a top version of Holmes in a grueling struggle just 9 months prior to the Shavers fight. He looked pretty good doing it. At a time when age was catching up with him the Shavers demolition probably didn't do much for him in subsequent matches.
     
  11. Combatesdeboxeo_

    Combatesdeboxeo_ Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,991
    1,141
    Nov 19, 2016
    Norton was in his prime in 73-74. He was a finished fighter at the moment he fought shavers. AND OF COURSE THAT HE WAS WELL PAST HIS PRIME WHEN HE FOUGHT HOLMES IN 1978.holmes fought the war of his life against a past prime fighter.. A 74 norton beats holmes sure
     
  12. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,255
    6,542
    Jan 22, 2009
    George's stamina was a question as well. But his chin was granite.
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.
  13. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,658
    Dec 31, 2009
    George Foreman wins this fight in an absolute flash. Having a Punchers chance won’t beat a great fighter.
     
  14. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,570
    12,001
    Sep 21, 2017
    Norton was always susceptable to big punchers.
     
    Smoochie likes this.
  15. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,570
    12,001
    Sep 21, 2017
    That just let's us know that Norton was at least still good enough to give prime Holmes a war, so he should've been good enough to beat Shavers, if he ever could.
     
    Smoochie likes this.