Deontay win vs Ortiz propels him to #1 in the HW division. Irrefutable

i might go the next five, not ten.

 

joshua, wilder, parker, povetkin, ortiz, pulev. maybe you could make an argument for a couple more.

 

There are several Eastern European fighters coming up that would knock Wilder's chicken arse out! Wilder has never fought a legit opponent, it's time he does. Will he fight a 50 year old Ortiz? Breazeale is waiting to be called as a substitute, he is also owned by Haymon.......................can't fight at all, but he is mandatory, Breazeale became mandatory by getting knocked out by Joshua!

 

Most recognise Takam as good quality. That can be seen on how hard he was to put away for AJ. Parker took him on when no one but Povetkin would. Takam was avoided even after his Povetkin loss.

Parker was stuffed when hughie first pulled out. The big Romanian was literally the only ranked opponent that would take the fight on short notice. Breazeale agreed but wanted to postpone the fight for months. Parker got absolute **** for it. Not putting the Romanian away early put him in a no win situation.

I don't begrudge AJ fighting Takem. In fact IF AJ and Wilder both fought Takam, Ruiz, and Hughie Fury, then everyone would be saying those two belt holders are not as good as we thought.

 

I would expect a prime boxer to KO an old man with diagnosed high blood pressure, a win over Ortiz is expected for me.

 

Ortiz' heart pills give him too much of an advantage! Wilder ought to complain. It's like carrying a knife into the ring.

 

I don't follow the HW scene since it's a joke but didn't Joshua have a great fight and KO Klit? That alone trumps anything Wilder has done. And watching both men fight, Joshua looks and fights like a legit boxer. Wilder looks like an angry drunk bar bum, throwing ridiculous haymakers while he falls over himself. One has good technique while the other has horrible technique and is clumsy. LOL

 

But then surely you would not feel he was #1 if Joshua and Parker face each other and a winner is declared.
You have your top 5 without Ortiz in it and have Joshua at 1 and Parker at 3 so the winner of that fight would by your ranking be #1 wouldnt they, or even if they drew there would be no move?

Explain??

 

Really what champ did Stivern win his title from again.... stivern won a vacant title.

 

And that Wlad is still light years better then wilders best win stivern... and Martin was ranked seventh after winning his title.

 

Don't bother. He's either an imbecile, a troll or both. You won't get a sensible response to your very valid question because it highlights just how ridiculous this thread is.

 

Did this idiotic thread make "James Slater" write that idiotic front page column with the exact same title? Or are MVC and "James Slater" the same person? Why do I have this iffy feeling the owners of the site enjoy trolling users with these windup-type articles and threads?

 

Wlad was old and washed up and Martin didn't beat a ****en soul to get ranked by any organization period, let alone fight for a vacant title.

 

It wasn't given to Stiverne. Martin and Wlad had titles given to them.

 

You haven't seen Wilder in a while. That is apparent, lmao. And you didn't see Joshua Takam either.