Marciano v.s. Bruno ?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by he grant, Feb 20, 2010.


  1. The Kentucky Cobra

    The Kentucky Cobra Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,576
    2,517
    Jan 9, 2017
    I guess my fault. I just challenged the notion that Marciano's win over Charles be disregarded as a "struggle against an old light heavy" when Charles was less than two years older and actually out weighed the Rock in their second bout, and Charles left LHW at a young age of 26.

    That was my point. Regarding Bruno, Rocky comes in at 192 and executes his Joe Louis strategy to grind the big lug down for the mid round KO...that is unless Bruno hyperventilates before....thats that.

    While we are at, Charles stops Bruno late. Maybe Bruno beats Cokell, maybe..Bruno dont have too many sure things. Maybe Cokell uses his "one night invincibility" cheat, and Bruno gets tired of hitting him and falls into the ropes from a couple punches late..and gets stopped.
     
    Last edited: Jan 2, 2018
    Unforgiven likes this.
  2. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    And yet the hysteria of the Rockophobes seems completely rational?
     
  3. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,579
    Nov 24, 2005
    Well, yeah, he does have to be over 175 to be a heavyweight.
    Otherwise, he's a LHW beating HWs. I can't disagree with that.

    And, while I'd agree with you that at 166 or whatever he might still have been more of a middleweight than a light-heavyweight, (ie. a middleweight on the large size who didn't need to make weight for non-title fights) it's not the same thing as him being "a sub-175 heavyweight", which is impossible beyond debate (or so I would think ....).
     
  4. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    Hey don’t knock the US Army weight requirements data. It’s still my proudest work! :thumbsup:
     
    Unforgiven likes this.
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,044
    48,170
    Mar 21, 2007
    Sadly, this may be true.
     
    choklab and Bukkake like this.
  6. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,579
    Nov 24, 2005
    Well, i'd agree with the gist of that.
    The fact is, he'd fought fit and lean in the 182 to 192 pound range for about 25 fights over the previous 4 or 5 years leading up to the Marciano fights, so he's proven at that weight range .... which was heavyweight.


    Bruno pummels Cokell.
    Charles beats Bruno, I agree.
     
    The Kentucky Cobra likes this.
  7. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    Yes I see what you mean. Over 175 to be a heavyweight himself. I will take that.

    But to go from middle to LHW he dosnt have to be 175 because 161-175 covers the limit?
     
    Last edited: Jan 2, 2018
  8. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    This is beyond doubt.
     
  9. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,579
    Nov 24, 2005
    Yeah, Bruno's only real answer to Tyson was to grab and pull on the back of his neck. People make a big deal out of Bruno wobbling Tyson a bit later on in the round with a couple of hard punches but most of his stuff was desperate wrestling. Bruno's jab was almost useless.
    Bruno's success in the fight was grossly exaggerated, for a couple of reasons. 1. Tyson hadn't often been wobbled at all, and 2. As you say, he looked completely doomed with seconds, so taking a beating over 5 rounds was something remarkable.
     
  10. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,579
    Nov 24, 2005
    Technically, strictly speaking, 161 must be within LHW, because it is over the MW limit.
    But we know that's not true in reality. A fighter weighing 161 in a non-title fight is almost certainly a middleweight. It would be very unusual for it to be something otherwise.
     
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,044
    48,170
    Mar 21, 2007
    Of course not! You don't have to be 175 to be a LHW. Fair enough, if he's 161, 163, whatever, but this is one of your more bizarre notions, that there's some idea you have to be 175lbs to be a light-heavyweight.
     
  12. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    No no, I was just establishing what folks thought the perameter should be on the subject.

    LHW is an odd fish. There were not that many card carrying LHW exclusive to the division since so many tangled with heavyweight opponents and those less than 170 seen as a middleweight.
     
  13. lloydturnip

    lloydturnip Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,231
    1,654
    Sep 5, 2016
    If Frank can get his jab working he would cut the rock to ribbons Brunos jab was a real weapon and he had the power to take anyone out he connects with but I think Rocky would get in close and rumble standing on Brunos feet and smashing the hooks rights and elbows until the ref stops it in about seven.good fight a bit like a HW Moore Duran.
     
    choklab likes this.
  14. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,935
    44,798
    Apr 27, 2005
    You are such a nonsense, and a lying one at that :lol:

    Lord help us.
     
  15. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,935
    44,798
    Apr 27, 2005
    The parameter of the time is abundantly clear!!! Technically anything between 160 and 175 is light heavyweight. How this could even be debated i will never know.

    Near as good as the average weight fiasco.