Not the worst decision I've ever seen, but certainly not one that I like. I really do feel like Lee earned a clear decision in this bout. He landed a lot of hard, clean shots on DeWitt and it wasn't until the final round that DeWitt applied any kind of effective, heavy pressure. Soaking up punishment with your cement head/chin does not mean you're winning a fight. Being unaffected by a punch does not mean it isn't scoring points for the other guy. A young, up and coming Lee was struggling as much against with inactivity at the time as his in the ring opposition, and here he was robbed of any and all momentum he had following his big upset loss over dangerous Tony Sibson a little over a year prior. Lee should have the underrated stoppage win of Sibson and a clear points win over a 25-1, 23 year old Doug DeWitt, all within a little over one year. Instead, he had his career completely sputter out, where he sat out of the ring for almost two years before his next fight of consequence, where he rocked his opponent early but was eventually stopped late in the fight. There really isn't much justice in boxing. There was plenty of talk from the commentary team about the winner of this bout getting a much anticipated step up against a world class, name opponent like Marvin Hagler. Instead we got strangely coincidental 5-5 scoring from all three judges, not a surprise considering this was in DeWitt's backyard and the crowd was very pro DeWitt. Take a gander and maybe score this one if you have the chance, sometime. It's a pretty good little fight. I agree with the surprisingly unbiased Ray Mancini in terms of scoring. This content is protected
I remember watching the Sibson fight, I was only about 13 at the time. I remember Lee would switch between orthodox and southpaw, and being 6'2 and with a 79 inch wingspan against the much smaller Sibson worked really well. He dropped Sibson a few times in that fight and I believe he was dropped once or twice himself. I never saw the Dewitt fight, but wasn't he destroyed by Michael Olajide shortly after?
Yeah it was a bad decision, but Lee shouldn't have been so inactive. It appeared he was sitting on his ranking between '84 and '87. Hagler wasn't a just a "world class name opponent." He was the undisputed champion who picked and chose his fights, meaning anyone in the top 10 had a very small chance of getting to face him. Too many guys sat on their ranking while hoping they'd be the one to fight him. Kinchen and Shuler did the same thing. Mugabi did it too but ultimately did get the Hagler fight.
I remember watching that fight when it happened, but haven't seen it since. I remember watching Lee and Dewitt coming up on ESPN.
The Olajide loss was two years after the DeWitt fight. Lee was way too inactive following the upset of Sibson and never fully capitalized on it. With only one champion, who was picking and choosing his fights (Hagler), it was difficult to strategize if you were a top contender. Do you sit on your ranking and fight bums and hope you'll eventually get a title shot, or do you remain active against live opposition and risk losing. Lee did take this fight against DeWitt but otherwise sat on his ranking for basically three years.