Is Ken Norton a top 20 ATG Heavyweight?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Russell, Jan 16, 2018.


  1. Gudetama

    Gudetama Active Member Full Member

    1,020
    889
    Sep 11, 2017
    A ranking of anywhere between 20 and 30 might be reasonable, I think.
     
    bodhi and The Long Count like this.
  2. GoldenHulk

    GoldenHulk Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,483
    4,881
    Jan 7, 2007
    I always felt kinda bad for Kenny because unlike Ali, Frazier, Foreman and Holmes he didn't have his own era back in the 70's which I believe is from September of 1976-June of 1978. Ken clearly beat Ali in their third fight, and his wins over Bobick, Zanon, and Jimmy Young should have counted as title defenses.
    Instead he was given the WBC belt because Leon Spinks wouldn't fight him in March 78 and fought Holmes in a close fight but lost it 3 months later in June.
     
    Russell and JC40 like this.
  3. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    51,339
    41,248
    Apr 27, 2005
    I wouldn't begrudge anyone slipping Kenny into the bottom of the 20.
     
  4. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    Top30 for sure. Top25 probably. Top20, barely misses out I think. He had the style to beat some greater fighters than him and at the same time to lose to some lesser fighters than him. He did both but the latter more than the former. Not that he wasn't good enough but there were others who either achieved more or have better resumes and were more consistent. He'd beat some of those ranking ahead of him though.
     
    Cecil and Gudetama like this.
  5. Gudetama

    Gudetama Active Member Full Member

    1,020
    889
    Sep 11, 2017
    Agree the s#*! out of this. Personally I put him in and around a group comprising Walcott, Charles, Schmeling, Baer and Patterson. Just not sure exactly where he fits in.
     
    Mendoza and bodhi like this.
  6. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,230
    8,439
    Oct 8, 2013
    Norton is tricky I mean how many quality wins does he have?

    Ali for sure that's one.
    Jimmy Young in a razor close fight some feel he lost.
    A badly faded Quarry.

    His career really hangs on the Ali trilogy. He was destroyed by every big puncher he fought not just losing but being wiped out before the 3rd round.

    He gets credit for the fact Ali couldn't figure him out and he fought Holmes close. (Imo Holmes won more clearly than the cards indicated)

    There are at least 20 guys who have more quality wins than Norton.

    Tough to place him. I have him around 30. I liked his style and the person but I feel the number of good wins on his resume are lacking.
     
  7. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,330
    Jun 29, 2007
    I see you moved Mickey Walker way back to 91-100. Kudos, but I still think Walker should not make the top 100.

    While I'm not here to rip the time or effort as its generally good, I find the following placements a bit off. I'll start at below #75 with a one liner, who knows, maybe you'll re-evaluate at a future date like you did with Mickey Walker.

    #72 Hamas? Lucky to make the top 100
    #71 Layne. Way too high. A bad pick I think
    #59. Fulton. Bad pick. Even the most hard core Dempsey fans would not place him this high
    #57. Kid Norfolk. Not in the top 75, I think
    #52. Loughran He's a light heavy, and should not rate in the top 75
    #47. Greb. Maybe in the top 75 to 100...
    #31 Ray. A bad pick this high. Too many losses. No film. Perhaps a gift win over Charles.
    #12. Wills. Shocked. Above Jeffries, Dempsey, Langford and the Klitschko's???
    #5 Frazier. I never saw Frazier this high, not even from one of the best historians / writers who absolutely loves him and has al of his films in the very highest quality.


    I'd pick many of the guys I rated from 1986-current that you did not mention to beat Hamas to Ray.


    Enclosed are my top 15 ranked heavyweights at 20-year intervals. The criteria for the ranking as follows.

    1 ) Head to head vs. the field, which is strictly my personal opinion. 40% weighting
    2 ) Resume of wins and losses, excluding losses that happened when a fighter was past their prime. 30%
    3 ) The distinction of the fighter as champion by beating top contenders in title matches if applicable. 20%
    4 ) Historians input, which matters most to fighters, not on film. 10%
    I will try to list each fighter only once, placing him closest to his prime years.

    1885-1905 Pioneer era: The transitional time between bare knuckles and London Prize-ring rules to Queensberry rules.

    1.Jeffries
    2.Fitzsimmons
    3A. Jackson
    3B. Corbett
    5. Sullivan
    6. Sharkey
    7. Slavin
    8. Ruhlin
    9. Goddard
    10. Maher
    11. Choynski
    12. Hart
    13. McCoy
    14. O’Brien
    15. Root

    1906-1925 Black and white filmed era:

    1. Dempsey
    2. J. Johnson
    3. Tunney
    4. Langford
    5. Wills
    6. Jeannette
    7. McVey
    8. Willard
    9. Greb
    10. Gibbons
    11. Burns
    12. Miske
    13. Godfrey
    14. Norfolk
    15. Smith

    1926-1945 Great Depression to World War II: An era where war and the great depression in the USA hurt boxing. I have trouble with the bottom of this list, and the depth is rather thin. I also think very few in this timeline would be in the top ten today.

    1. Louis
    2. Charles
    3. Schmeling
    4. Walcott
    5. M Baer
    6. Carnera
    7. Godfrey
    8. Moore
    9. Bivins
    10. Schaff
    11. Conn
    12. Hamas
    13. Pastor
    14. Farr
    15. Loughran

    1946-1965 Golden age era:
    1. Liston
    2. Marciano
    3. Patterson
    4.Johansson
    5. Ray
    6. Terrell
    7. Machen
    8. Folley
    9. Williams
    10. H. Johnson
    11. Valdes
    12. D Jones
    13. Chuvalo
    14. Cooper
    15. Harris

    1966-1985: TV expansion to Cable and PPV: This era is loaded with talent.

    1. Ali
    2. Holmes
    3. Foreman
    4. Frazier
    5. Norton
    6. Witherspoon
    7. Thomas
    8. Quarry
    9. Page
    10. Coetzee
    11. Shavers
    12. Lyle
    13. Cooney
    14. Young
    15. Weaver


    1986-2000: 12 round era and super heavyweight era. This era had tremendous depth and a lot of talent.

    1. Lewis
    2. Holyfield
    3. Tyson
    4. Bowe
    5. Ibeabuchi
    6.Byrd
    7. Morrer
    8. Mercer
    9. Douglas
    10. Tua
    11. Morrison
    12. Bruno
    13. Tucker
    14. Rhaman
    15. McCall


    2001-( ratings are of 2013 ) 2021 – Eastern European dominance era. While this era is only half over, the nations producing the top talent has shifted. Once the iron curtain in Eastern Europe fell both the amateur and professional ranks have been dominated by Eastern Europeans. Since many of the below fighters careers are over, and future talent in the amateurs will arrive, this list will likely look very different by 2021. Hopefully, we will all be here to debate it!

    1A. V Klitschko
    1B. W Klitschko
    3. Povetkin
    4. Chagaev
    5. Sanders
    6. Ibragimov
    7. Haye
    8. Brewster
    9. Peter
    10. Adamek
    11. Chambers
    12. Valuev
    13. Gomez
    14. Solis
    15. Arreola

    ***Joshua now at #6 and trending upward, the others move down a spot. From here on it, it seems like 8 of 10 ranked Ring Magazine heavyweight is 6'4" to 6'9" tall, so the next bracket should be named Super Heavyweight dominance. I expect young Hrgovic to rate and possibly Dycho and Usyk.
     
  8. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    35,456
    10,439
    Jan 6, 2007
    Great minds....


    (11 -20 thread)

    [url]https://www.boxingforum24.com/threads/your-second-10-all-time-heavyweights-11-20.600136/page-3#post-18967957[/url]


    Johnson
    Dempsey
    Holyfield
    Patterson
    Charles
    Walcott
    Corbett
    Wills
    Norton
    Vitali K
     
    Russell likes this.
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,819
    45,532
    Mar 21, 2007
    I didn't move him; he's always been there.
     
  10. FrankinDallas

    FrankinDallas FRANKINAUSTIN

    27,891
    34,049
    Jul 24, 2004
    The hate is strong in this one, my son.
     
  11. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,439
    12,838
    Apr 1, 2007
    Yeah, not having him in the top 50 is not a position that anyone could hope to argue for. It's unreasonable. Ignorant even.
     
  12. FrankinDallas

    FrankinDallas FRANKINAUSTIN

    27,891
    34,049
    Jul 24, 2004
    My mother is dead, thanks for reminding me.

    And I'm older than you.

    Besides, you couldn't be my son...you're too ugly to have any of my DNA.
     
    mcvey likes this.
  13. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,439
    12,838
    Apr 1, 2007
    Err even these fighters don't really deserve to be rank alongside one another. Do you really think those mentioned accomplished similar things?
     
  14. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    79,846
    20,414
    Sep 15, 2009
    Lol
     
  15. LD Boxer-Puncher

    LD Boxer-Puncher Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,775
    1,171
    May 10, 2017
    Not for me personally, but he just about misses out