How did Ray Robinson navigate such a gifted path as a pro ?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by he grant, Jan 20, 2018.


  1. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,276
    9,115
    Jul 15, 2008
    The more you study the hardships endured by 99% of black fighters through out the first two thirds of the 20th Century the more I am amazed at how Ray Robinson managed to chart an easier imperative path .. no doubt he was an exceptional fighter but I question if he would have been 128 - 1 - 2 if he had to travel the route other exceptional fighters did .. I think Ray was very intelligent and knew how to scheme as proven in the way he managed to go AWOL from the army and get away with it .. he had brains, street smarts and will to travel paths of lesser resistance .. I'd like too hear thoughts from any scholars of that period ..
     
  2. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,412
    Feb 10, 2013
    I dont subscribe to the idea that Robinson had an easier path. That assumes that the other fighters supposedly had to fight tougher opposition to get nowhere fast. Im not convinced thats the case. Thats modern hipster revision. The short answer to why Robinson was able to open more doors quickly is simple: Money. He was a big drawing card. He had been a big drawing card as an amateur, internationally famous before he ever turned pro. His fame at that point was easily equal to the modern Olympic gold medal boxing champions. Compare that to the boring, colorless Burley who also happened to be absolutely inept at the bargaining table and its easy to see why Robinson was able to get a fight with the top drawing card at Madison Square Garden one year from turning pro. You could argue that Robinson getting fights with such highly touted names so early in his career was easier than toiling in the trenches like some of his black contemporaries but the fact remains that as a very green pro he was fighting some of the toughest men in the world and winning, thats not easy. And after beating champions in two divisions he basically had to wait 5 years for a title shot and fought some damn tough opposition along the way. Thats not easy either. So no, I dont agree his path was easier. I think doors opened easier for him because of the work he put into his career as both an amateur and a pro but it was work and it wasnt easy. Once those doors opened he still had to fight those big names and win, again not easy.
     
    Subak, DJN16, johnmaff36 and 18 others like this.
  3. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    60,554
    44,423
    Feb 11, 2005
    Interesting conversation.
     
    Sphillips and joe brown like this.
  4. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,276
    9,115
    Jul 15, 2008
    I'm sure it's all of that plus management and promotion and timing ... I am not super versed in that time slot or those divisions but I'm studying them .. many sources seem to point to him being able to make use of his marketability, management, promotional contacts and skills to avoid a tougher road ... I"m not exactly sure where specific career arcs could have intersected or not but .. the math as a whole seems to say he was not out to prove he could beat the best of the best but instead he fought and defeated all he had to to achieve what he wanted to .. some fighters are also simply luckier .. Ali was with a short cut to the title, Ray Leonard, it happens opposed to the Marvin Haglers and Larry Holmes ...
     
    red_roo and robert ungurean like this.
  5. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,412
    Feb 10, 2013

    For a guy who supposedly wasnt out to neat the best he has one of the deepest resumes in history. Within just over a year of turning pro he had three champions on his resume. Thats not pushing yourself? And its not like he was waiting until the top guys he fought got old. LaMotta, prime. Fullmer, prime. Basilio, prime. Gavilan, prime. Angott, prime. Servo, prime. Wilson, prime. Basora, prime. Maxim, prime. You can keep going but the point is Robinson wasnt avoiding challenges.

    Its an interesting comparison you make to Ali and Leonard because both of those guys, like Robinson, were already highly touted, very polished fighters with strong media interest the instant they turned pro.

    Hagler and Holmes bitched and moaned that they were stars immediately but loved to ignore that both were surly and arrogant, often came of as whiny, and in both cases couldnt leverage their amateur careers to stardom. Hagler jumped out of the amateurs just as he started making a name for himself nationally and Holmes had a hard time living down what many called a cowardly performance against Bobick. Of course those guys had more to prove to gain the attention of the press and the public.
     
    Last edited: Jan 20, 2018
    Bokaj, Sphillips, red_roo and 6 others like this.
  6. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,276
    9,115
    Jul 15, 2008
    Again, I"m studying it but in comparing it to Ezzard Charles, another amateur standout born in 1921, Ray's resume does not seem to compare in caliber or sacrificing weight at times to make the toughest bouts and I"m thinking that Ray had more leverage to call shots. Ali and Leonard eventually beat everyone and have exceptional resumes but coming up they were well and carefully managed till they hit a stride .. I feel Robinson surely had that same option and that plus his exceptional talent and charisma was a big help opposed to having to grind in out against the toughest opposition on short notice, with weight disadvantages, ect .. I guess I"m trying to determine if there were any fighters that Robinson might have had to fight that were in the 1941 - 49 year period that he didn't because of his skills inside and outside of the ring .. Archie Moore , Charley Burley, Ezzard Charles and many others fought everyone out there that they could get in the ring ... did Ray Robinson ? It seems to me that the best fighter he ever fought was Jake LaMotta, a hell of a fighter but not a top , top guy to me ..
     
    Last edited: Jan 20, 2018
    robert ungurean likes this.
  7. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,714
    3,452
    Jan 6, 2007
    Good SRR Article, including the AWOL "incident:
    http://www.secondsout.com/columns/thomas-hauser/sugar-ray-robinson-revisited--part-one
    Sugar Ray Robinson Revisited – Part One

    Several days after beating LaMotta for the second time, Robinson was inducted into the United States Army. World War II was raging. In August 1943, he and Joe Louis began a tour of military bases in the United States, giving boxing exhibitions for soldiers who were about to be sent overseas. Louis was the big name; Robinson the up-and-coming star. There were some ugly moments on segregated bases in southern states. Both men stood their ground.

    Then Louis and Robinson were sent to Fort Hamilton in Brooklyn, preparatory to continuing their tour abroad to boost the morale of American troops who were fighting in Europe. Robinson indicated that he had no interest in leaving the United States. The penalty for desertion was explained to him. At that point, depending on one’s version of events, either Robinson went AWOL or suffered a medical crisis. Either way, on March 29, 1944, he disappeared.

    Shortly after midnight on April 1st, Robinson was “found” by a stranger on a street in Manhattan. He was taken to a hospital on Staten Island, where he told Army investigators that he had no memory of what had happened during the preceding three days but believed that he had tripped over a duffel bag in the barracks and fallen down a flight of stairs, banging his head and incurring a severe case of amnesia.

    The examining physicians found no credible evidence of brain trauma. On April 7th, Robinson was detained by military police and held for court-martial. Then, for reasons that are unclear, on June 3, 1944 (three days before D-Day), he was discharged from the Army on “medical” grounds.
     
  8. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,412
    Feb 10, 2013

    Ezzard Charles didnt have 1/10 the press momentum turning pro that Robinson had.

    He fought LaMotta because LaMotta was a drawing card. LaMotta was a wealthy man 5 years before he won the title because he was a popular fighter with a following. Can Moore, Burley, or Charles say that? No. Charles and Moore didnt see their popularity explode until much later (And Im not sure you can say Charles popularity ever
    "exploded") Thats the point. If there was no juice behind those guys why fight them? Especially if they werent even in your division. Where exactly was the big call by the press, the public, and most importantly actual paying promoters for these fights to take place? Its not the fighters job to make fights he accepts the offers that are out there. Where are all of these big offers to fight Charles, Burley, Moore, et al by bonifide paying promoters for Robinson to fight them that trumped the actual numbers he was getting for the fights he took? Beyond that you take risks based on gaining some reward. Where is the payoff to fight those guys? As I said when Burley was trying to call out the biggest names in the sport his fan base was so tepid he couldnt even headline in his own town. Charles was fighting 30 pounds ahead of Robinson when he started fighting name fighters and by the time Robinson was fighting middleweights Charles was a LHW. Moore was fighting almost exclusively on the west coast until he jumped into the LHW division. When Robinson fought Jackie Wilson, another west coast fighter, Wilson came to New York established himself some press by fighting at St Nicks, established himself more with a Garden fight against LaMotta and THEN got a fight with the biggest star south of HW. Who were these people calling for a Moore-Robinson fight? None of it adds up. Its one thing to throw it out as a mythical matchup but to act like Robinson was somehow operating at a deficiency to his legacy because he wasnt specifically targeting these guys is a strange argument.

    You lost me claiming LaMotta wasnt a top top guy. He was the number one contender for years and a legend in his own time.
     
  9. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    7,800
    13,037
    Oct 20, 2017
    I've always thought it was BS to claim that Robinson was ducking Burley. Did he fight him? No. But why would he? All risk, no reward. It's like saying Thomas Hearns was ducking Mike McCallum at light middleweight. McCallum had no name, Hearns had a superfight with Duran. It would be extremely dumb to fight McCallum. If the money was right and the fighter's profile was bigger (the two usually go hand in hand) there's no question in my mind that Hearns or Robinson would have fought them. I think blaming them retrospectively as these fighters profiles grew is disingenuous. Burley flew under the radar of everyone for years. The guys he fought were other fighters with no profile but who have been retrospectively lauded. Robinson had a higher profile so maybe he could pick and choose more, but I don't see much evidence of him taking the easy road.
     
  10. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,276
    9,115
    Jul 15, 2008
    I guess the first sentence is a huge part of the answer. Robinson was out of NYC, highly accomplished as an amateur, exceptional and charismatic. He had it all and was able to tailor his path a bit more than others lacking n those departments. I will continue to research it.
     
    red_roo and 2piece like this.
  11. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,412
    Feb 10, 2013
    Geography definately plays a roll and more specifically New York. You werent breaking into New York as an outsider unless you either made an effort to establish yourself first and/or gave up something in return. Again, Robinson was very fortunate that he had such an unusual amount of press interest in him as an amateur which gave him a lot of momentum turning pro. I havent seen anything like that prior to Ali or maybe Patterson. The closest thing to it prior to those guys was Bob Martin who used his AEF championship to get a lot of interest in his pro career but he wasnt good enough to really capitalize on it. Ultimately you have to have the ability to back up all of that interest and good will. Robinson did.
     
    Bokaj, red_roo and janitor like this.
  12. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,967
    12,809
    Jan 4, 2008
    I don't think either Ali or SRL jumped the queue. They had beat legit contenders to end up as nr 1 contenders themselves. Foreman and Tyson are better examples in that case.

    Holmes had actually beat fewer ranked opponents than either Clay or Leonard when he got his shot. Despite not having any special amateur pedigree. And while Hagler had to toil around for quite a while, it was his own choice to turn pro instead of going for Olympic gold. Being a gold medalist can be seen as an investment to speed up a pro career.

    And no one can say that Robinson had it easy, having to face Angott, Zivic, Armstrong and LaMotta years before getting a title shot.
     
    Last edited: Nov 27, 2018
  13. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,412
    Feb 10, 2013
    Hagler is an interesting mention because when he turned pro just after winning the AAU title the local papers agreed that he had made a mistake and should have spent more time building up his reputation. Before he had ever fought anyone even close to being ranked he was complaining about his purse sizes and lack of national publicity. I think Hagler just had a very unrealistic view of his own worth as a fighter at that point.
     
  14. escudo

    escudo Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,298
    4,628
    May 13, 2014
    This. Those who saw even amature SRR knew they were seeing something very strange and very special.He had the style to drop the jaws of fans and fellow fighters alike. To see a guy who could throw 5 KO punches fluidly in combination at such speed is amazing. Say what you will about the political biases of the era, but "Sugar" Ray's abilityis both universal and timeless. It is an absolute credit to his abilities that he was able to transcend it.
     
    Bokaj, red_roo and Rumsfeld like this.
  15. PaddyGarcia

    PaddyGarcia Trivial Annoyance Gold Medalist Full Member

    16,188
    13,230
    Feb 13, 2014
    Some excellent knowledge here, lads
     
    red_roo and mcvey like this.