Lot of ppl On this forum have a big crush on Wlad and express it in the same manner a 7 year old boy does when he crushes on a girl.
Still a pretty cringeworthy set of excuses. I know Haye was nowhere near the decorated champion that Wlad was but he has toe jokes thrown at him whenever he opens his mouth - Wlad meanwhile went full tinfoil and nobody mentions it.
so if they were completely different cases, why did you bring them up as the same case? u utter flop, you just destroyed your own argument.
I went to this fight!! Wlad was absolutely smashing Brewster for the first 5 rounds.. most people forget, that Wlad was the first to knock down Brewster.. He was literally seconds from finishing the fight.. very strange how things just turned around and Wlad couldn't even keep his head up when sitting in the corner. I remember walking to my hotel room, and drinking a fifth of hennessy, then just going to sleep at 11pm. was not a good night. I used to be a huge Wlad fan.
What are you talking about now? God damn you're senile.. Do I have to re tread the whole thing again in chronological order just to cater for your Alzheimer's?
Here's the conversation again. If you need your carer to help you I'll wait: My my you are dense.. I never stated they were identical. Hence why I quoted a particular part of your post. Learn to read. Now the win loss ratio I keep asking you for? Google it. Post it. We can then further our discussion.. That's how this works.
so you claim a case is similar to support wlad brewtser 2, and then claim its not the same, and hope noeone will notice you just did that. You utter fail.
how it works for you, it seems, is you claim a point and then totally disown it next post. There is no arguing with someone like that.