Hector Camacho - ATG?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Jel, Jan 23, 2018.


  1. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,345
    45,526
    Apr 27, 2005
    What "great" fighters would you say he beat?

    I'd agree he was a heckuva fighter early on.
     
  2. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,655
    9,743
    Jul 15, 2008
    Camacho was great at 130 .. he was a true superstar in the sport till the Rosario bout which he never recovered from .. he completely changed his style to safety first and tried far less .. from that point on he was never close to his best again.
     
  3. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,655
    9,743
    Jul 15, 2008
    That being said he was still a very crafty , very good fighter at 135 and 140 and even welter .. he beat a lot of good fighters .. just not an all timer ..
     
  4. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,763
    24,628
    Jul 21, 2012
    A guy who fought from 130 to 168 without ever getting knocked out deserves some sort of ATG recognition. Plus he's definitely in the mix as one of the best 130 pounders ever.
     
  5. Cobra33

    Cobra33 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,215
    13,477
    Feb 2, 2006
    Look at how many champions he beat.
     
  6. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,345
    45,526
    Apr 27, 2005
    Yes but what "great" fighters?
     
  7. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,655
    9,743
    Jul 15, 2008
    It can be argued Joss Luis Ramirez and Edwin Rosario were near greats. He beat Boza-Edwards, Howard Davis, Vinny Paz, Bazooka Limon .. Of course there are stories with each one of these but the bottom line is that even as a guy that fought out of his best weight and really only partially dedicated he stayed a respectable contender for a hell of a long time thru four divisions .. he always was very smart, clever in the ring, had terrific defense, an exceptional chin, terrific speed and overall boxing ability ... the only beatings he ever took were against a prime , far more motivated Chavez and prime Oscar and Felix, bigger and younger guys who were terrific fighters ..
     
  8. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,345
    45,526
    Apr 27, 2005
    You said it yourself HG - "near greats". I'm not trying to downplay Camacho i am challenging Cobra to name the actual "greats" Camacho beat. If he beat a great my definition of greatness must be well off track.
     
  9. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,655
    9,743
    Jul 15, 2008
    I appreciate your point .. by no means was he all time great to me .. he had a shot at 130 but post Rosario lost the burning desire in my opinion.
     
  10. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,345
    45,526
    Apr 27, 2005
    Good record tho. As i posted earlier i think he peaked early for various reasons Rosario being one and life in the fast lane another.
     
  11. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,582
    Nov 24, 2005
    Sugar Ray Leonard actually entered the ring against Camacho as the slight favourite.
     
  12. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,582
    Nov 24, 2005
    I'd rate Camacho somewhere below Azumah Nelson and somewhere above James Toney.
    And I don't think an awful lot separates them.
     
    Ra's Al-Ghul likes this.
  13. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,427
    11,890
    Mar 19, 2012
    Im a fan of Hector but in my mind there needed to be a little more Warrior in there with the slick boxer. At times he needed to show more and put away the pretty stuff. He did gut out the Rosario fight but after that i saw a guy who shut his offense down when he needed to ramp it up.
     
  14. richdanahuff

    richdanahuff Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,497
    13,061
    Oct 12, 2013
    ATG talent not ATG career but a very good one
     
  15. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    7,857
    13,177
    Oct 20, 2017
    I'd actually rate him significantly lower than Nelson and definitely below Toney too. The problem with Camacho is that other than at 130 where he showed genuine brilliance, he was never in the conversation as one of the world's very best.

    Nelson dominated at feather and super featherweight and Toney was considered one of the best in the world when he was at 168.

    Camacho's title reigns were very short and he didn't establish himself as the best in the divisions he held titles in. His talent was greater than his actual achievements in my view.