Who exactly has Terence Crawford beat? His resume is Weak

Fair play,it’s possible to pick holes if you wanna find em which is why I’ve never looked for any in Crawford,ok he had that one stinker against Postal but I think he’s aware of that and has looked awesome since.
I’ll ad to that he’s the only guy saying he’ll fight Spence at the mo as well.

 

It's a shallow p4p top 10 at the moment since all the guys with great records are either retired or super declined. For right now though, Crawford has one of the best records in the sport, showed dominance in two divisions, and passes the eye test. He's also up to about 10 title fights with the WBO belts, which is a level of achievement that most champions don't make, especially the ones that try to unify.

 

Absolutely and I was one who though Brook would be too much but after seeing him in someone else’s backyard do that it’s hard to ever doubt the guy again and let’s be real here Spence and Crawford would both tell you they have loads to do yet but so far they’ve looked good doing it.

 

Hold the phone! How dare you come onto this site and claim you like both Lomachenko and Crawford! GET OUTTA HERE YOU PSYCO!

 

Lol you said it,I still don’t get why I can’t like Manny P and Floyd?

 

Postil was a good win
The Cuban is tiny and he for rocked a few times
Indongo big and quite dangerous but not schooled and technique poor.

OK wins. Nothing spectacular.

 

The fact that you don't even mention Felix Diaz shows that you aren't educated enough to be dissecting his resume.

 

No you're just trying to make me mad! LOL

 

You mean the same Lamont Peterson that beat Danny Garcia in the eyes of most? Yeah, sure, let's mock a close loss to him, surely that makes you a bum...

 

Crawford has faced a good number of "decent" opponents but he majorly lacks an elite name/match up. He needs to face Spence or Thurman or someone on a similar level.

 

This entire post reeks of Mayweather jedi mind elitism.
Let me explain, never has there been such a cry for guys to have all these names attached to them to validate their dominance. When Golovkin was fighting "bums" and he had no name recognition to his resume that people wanted he was deemed a can crusher and defended by his fans for "lack of competition".
Now this thread accuses Crawford of fighting "bums" while openly being ducked by PBC guys and Manny Pacquiao in his own promotional stable. Is this not the inconsistencies that makes me troll this site more than talk boxing?
This is it, this is why I write the garbage I do. How can you act sane with engaging with the insane?

How does this connect to Floyd? He was saying this **** for 8 years straight and old threads on here can prove it and people rebuttled it every time. Yet, here we are 2018 and you mutha****as parrot that trash statement every chance you get. Do you understand that Usyk just went to war and beat a virtual NOBODY?!!!
Nobody gives a **** about cruiserweight or the tournament they had and in a casual sense every last one of those guys are unknown bums with no name recognition on their records. Now we can argue on this board that logic but go to yahoo sports and try to convince more than 100 people to care. Thats how easy it id with negative bias. CST80 did a post on this subject before.

Floyd fight GGG. "He ain't beat nobody"!
Floyd fight Margarito. "He ain't beat nobody"!
Floyd fight Martinez at 154. "He ain't beat nobody"!
Floyd fight Bradley, he just beat Pacquiao. "He ain't beat nobody"!

 

Crawford struggled badly with Gamboa that's rich.

Scores at the time of the stoppage:

Levi Martinez 78-72 | Dennis Nelson 78-72 | Robert Hecko 77-73

what a struggle.

 

crawford will get credit if he beats thurman/spence

 

Crawford needs to fight Porter next instead of the joke Kangaroo Horn................who can't fight at all.............