Sonny Liston & Sam Peter Who Was The Harder Puncher?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Jan 30, 2018.


  1. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    rahman was shot, thats why I said 2 relevant HWs. By relevant I mean world class, Ruiz and Peter.

    With that choice, Peter gets the nod for sure over the sloppy hitting ruiz.
     
    mcvey likes this.
  2. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,591
    17,669
    Apr 3, 2012
    There you go thinking about tall, chiseled European guys with funny accents again.
     
    BCS8, mrkoolkevin and Colonel Sanders like this.
  3. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    haha! if you can think of a more obvious example of a "muscleman"....

    aye Arnies the first one to jump to mind, everytime, its a 100% qualified post.
     
  4. lloydturnip

    lloydturnip Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,231
    1,654
    Sep 5, 2016
    Peter was a big strong lump slow with poor technique clubbing puncher.A poor man's Trevor Berbeck.
     
    mcvey and HerolGee like this.
  5. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    Sam Peter hit much harder than Trevor Berbick. It's not even close.
     
  6. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    Berbick was a lot better than Peter. He was conditioned for 15 rounds. Sam was a 6 rounder
     
    mcvey and lloydturnip like this.
  7. lloydturnip

    lloydturnip Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,231
    1,654
    Sep 5, 2016
    possibly could hit harder than trev if he could land anything ? Trev would brawl peter into submission in about seven rnds .Wouldn't be pretty!
     
    dinovelvet likes this.
  8. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,814
    Aug 26, 2011
    Who cares, Peter sucks. Liston was clearly better functionally to land the harder blows. Who cares if Peter could or couldn't land a harder fairgrounds punch.
     
  9. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,724
    29,075
    Jun 2, 2006
    Harder yes ,much harder,debateable, apart from that the description fits aptly.
     
  10. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,201
    23,814
    Jul 21, 2012
    Chambers was beer bellied and over weight against Peter coming in at 223. Against Wlad he weighed an optimal 209.

    He said povetkin hit harder than Peter.
     
    lloydturnip likes this.
  11. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,201
    23,814
    Jul 21, 2012
    No , he said it was Povekin.
     
  12. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    How is that debatable? Which of their fights make you question whether Peter hit much harder than Trevor Berbick?
     
  13. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,724
    29,075
    Jun 2, 2006
    Who did Peter ko?
     
  14. lloydturnip

    lloydturnip Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,231
    1,654
    Sep 5, 2016
    Peter wasn't as crazy as Trevor! .Trev was a fruit loop!
     
  15. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    Is that really how you measure punching power though? We've already been through all the obvious reasons why Peter did not have more kos against quality opponents. He lacked skill, stamina, speed, and accuracy. This one's a no-brainer if you watch their fights and observe the impact of their blows on their opponents, imo. Not even close. Peter knocked lesser opponents out cold and made plenty of other opponents adopt safety-first fight plans. Berbick was a high-pressure grinder who wore people down with pressure and mauling just as much as his actual punches (which were often arm punches).
     
    Last edited: Jan 30, 2018
    ticar and BCS8 like this.