Who exactly has Terence Crawford beat? His resume is Weak

WOW!!! “Old Midget Rigondeaux”??! You just turn on and throw the guy under the bus like that?? You were basically worshipping him a few months ago and trying to get us spooked about the Loma fight!

“Loma gonna enter the matrix with Rigo and come back with a new face.”

Ring a bell?

 

Same guy who SRL rates? Same guy who whooped Gonzalez who has wins over Mares, Montiel, Arce, Rojas & Hasegawa etc? Him?

 

He was making out Loma was basically going to get 'a gift decision' too..

 

Hahaha! Times are rough for his types now days And it’s only going to get worse. Plus he might be still a little triggered from UFC 220’s Main event. Lol

 

On the shelf? You do know Gamboa had fought only once on 18 months when he fought Crawford? Crawford was only his second fight at LW too!

Walters on the shelf? He'd been out for 11 months! Only a month more than Postol when Crawford beat him! Walters destroyed Donaire who was carrying the WBA SFW strap after having just beaten Vetyeka! Same guy who took Chris Johns '0'..

Loma beat this guy with only 7 fights under his belt & you're here shitting on it! Wtf!

You do know Crawford basically thinks Gamboa is his best win don't you (or one of them)?? Your calling out Loma on fighting midgets!! Crawford is a LHW right now you do know that don't u?!

Please take your head out of your arse!

 

Crawford and Lomachencko are at the top right now, regardless of how "weak" their resume are. Anybody who say otherwise is fanboy or have an "agenda". Who is the best, it is hard to tell.

 

the guys he fought are good. he made them look weak. felix diaz and postol are good fighters he schooled them.

and he knocks all these guys out like he supposed to. all signs point to hes the real deal. jeff horn is gonna be another solid name on the resume. bud to skilled too fast and even tho bud maybe smaller hes still strong enough to hurt horn an to keep him off of him.

 

Yes old midget. Hard to show it in the ring against Flores and Dickens, although there were hints of slowing foot quickness and speed against Dickens. Lomachenko's fresh legs, exposed Rigo's aging.

 

FO with your old midget ****! You were suggesting he was going to outbox him but lose to work rate! Now he got schooled you're on damage control. Embarrassing. Midget! Loma is hardly Joshua is he! Any height loma had could easily have been negated by Rigos longer reach! As he proved in many previous fights. It wasn't Rigos height that lost it for him. It was Lomachenkos skill level. Height played no part. In fact ironically it probably was Rigos only saving grace, the way he was able to dip so low! A taller Rigos would have been even easier to hit. So quit your ****, he wasn't so old when you were suggesting before that he'd pizza face loma & land the more effective shots was he? What you're basically saying is you're not only a poor judge of Rigo but you can't even give due credit to Loma. Your quite a vile piece of work. Be mad at your hero & yourself not Loma.

 

You mean how you implied that I picked Rigo when Rigo was 37, inactive, and moving up 2 weight classes? Things I stated several times before the fight?

 

Aren't you a Wilder fan? Do you want to know the ages of some of his opposition

Ortiz, Stiverne, Audrey, Liakovich, Scott etc it's a roll call straight out of boxing's version of cocoon!

 

Except the difference is we know boxers in lower divisions age FAR worse. Name me some quality wins at 35+ from a boxer in and below. Also those guys didnt move up 2 weight classes lmfao after being already tiny in their former weight class.

 

That's funny cos little Floyd was going til his late 30s

Umhh, little guys.. off the top of my head:

-Azumah Nelson became champ at 37.
-Zaragoza became champ at 38.
-Jofre became champ again at 37.

I'm sure I could find many more if I were so inclined ..

Poor post. Style can age you as much as anything. Look at Hatton!!!

Fighters can still be world class in there mid 30s. Small ones too..

Don't pretend Wilders lot somehow defied age better than Rigo just cos they're more obese or taller or able to change a lightbulb! Which of those HWs I mentioned have aged better than Rigo iyo? Which ones are you arguing have aged well? Audley? Scott? Liakovich? Stiverne? Arreola? Duhaupas? Etc This should be fun.... LOL

As for moving up! Spinks did it. Moorer did it. It can be done at HW too! Though no, they are all natural HWs Wilders... Heavy being the operative word! I suspect most of them couldn't jump rope let alone weight. I have no problem with career FW/SFW Loma going to 135 or maybe even 140 at some point, though I think LW may be his ceiling.. Yet you're laughing at a SBW going to SFW! Laugh it up, Rigos bluff got called & the dark wizard got vanilla iced! Just like Gervonta Davis would

 

Floyd wasn't 122 and below. Name me the quality wins. Not fighters who won trinkets. I can name you top notch wins from boxers who are 35+ easily from welter and up. There's a reason why you don't see super dominant champions like Klitschko, Hopkins, etc 122 and below. Poor response for not even giving me names. You didn't convince anyone that 122 and below age as well as the higher divisions. You can't even name my boxers from a recent ERA LOL. Jesus what a fail.

The biggest difference with Wilder fighting those guys is at HW there is ALWAYS a punchers chance. There's a reason why Foreman was still dangerous as hell when he was nearly 50. The smaller guys don't carry the same punching power and add to the fact that Rigo moved up 2 weight classes at 37 while being inactive. What weight class did Loma win his olympic medal at? Loma isn't a tiny guy he's 5'7 lmao and he's not some super skinny guy like Corrales.

Loma isn't going to jump up 2 weight classes when he's 37 and inactive to fight a p4p talent.

Do you think Rigo is a comparable win to Wilder beating Ortiz?

 

It's disgusting that you are putting Wilder in the same sentence as a HOF fighter like Lomachenko.