Are there any fighters in history you think could beat a prime Roy Jones?

That post with all that info hit home. You present it well just like a lawyer. I believe in fair play that is one of the best posts I have read here ever. Thanks Again good stuff. Thats why I like Deontay over AJ.

 

The first time I joined the forum years ago you took me to the woodshed and really gave my hide a good tanning. Respect always man. And if anybody ever bothers you just say the word.

 

Serge, you dont ever forget a beating like that even though it was 9 years ago. In the end you had me believing you were a master psyhcic and astrologer. I was red faced for a day. Just sold a pair of boxing gloves to a boxer named Brian Banks from Atlanta Georgia a minute ago on EBAY. I hope hes good. We living in some weird times man. Seriously thats weird plus my friend supposed to sell me some boxing gloves autographed by Joe Frazier and Roy Jones Jr.
But back to you the beating I received has most definately made me a stronger and better human. Keep up Gods work man.
OK time to pack the gloves.

 

I've explained in detail why fighters who didn't cross the pond didn't get their career defining fights. you just don't have a reply to counter it.
also, I've noticed that you throw the 'immature' card out to other posters who disagree with you. perhaps you should avoid boxing forums totally if you're so thin-skinned that you can't handle constructive criticism

 

Which has nothing to do with Hopkins pulling out of an agreed fight with Calzaghe and immediately negotiating to face Joppy.

I'm calling you immature and biased because that is what you are. If you sleep better pretending it's just something I do because I can't handle your responses, than knock yourself out.

 

if you actually read my detailed post you'll see it has everything to do with Calzaghe - Hopkins in 2003. the fact you use the same 'immature' argument with others shows that you don't handle constructive criticism well.

it's much easier to try and discredit posters instead of actually replying to their constructive and detailed posts - something you still haven't done

if you understand the business of boxing (as you say you do) but you can't honestly understand why fighters who haven't gone to the US in the past have consistently missed out on fighting the best fighters on the planet, then that clearly puts your level of understanding in conflict

perhaps you can reply to my post, if you can, instead of dancing around the main point and assigning me with petty labels (which do nothing to bolster your point of view)

 

this bit makes you sound like you are in a pre match press conference.

 

3rd timer ask - would you highlight which sentence AI wrote that is immature?

or should we just assume you couldnt find a counterargument to him so you desperately threw your toys out of the pram with that claim.

how is it you havent answered this yet?

 

You are pathetically doing everthing you can to avoid talking about this. You have said zip on it.

Now Serge in the post above yours has just dropped a detailed breakdown on 03. You are in a corner, here,

Your so called detailed analysis is just a vague opinion piece completely crushed by the real facts Serge and I have told you.

You can man up, here, prove you are not biased and immature...or go the path of the Dino and Herol...and forever be a clown. Choice is yours.

 

This Aussie Invader is out right refusing to address any of this. Its well known Calzaghe chased the fight.

How sad is this guy, he has to ignore well documented facts, does he have his manhood staked on this, is he scared his testicles will shrink?

 

there a 3rd choice - the choice not to explain why Aussie Invader is being immature despite being asked to explain why 3 times in a row.