Who fought the toughest opponents Oscar or Mayweather?

Pbf is smaller than oscar troll he has no business at 160.

 

Spoken by someone who is still bitter and losing sleep at night about the night of may 2nd 2015. Pbf ud #48 now then and forever deal with it.

 

Yeah.. He went life and death with an old ODLH who was at the end of his career lol....

 

Mr.Mayweather did NOT go life and death with Oscar, he outboxed him comprehensively, 9-3.

Going life and death is Hagler vs Hearns, Gatti vs Ward.

Mayweather looked fresh as a daisy coming out of that fight, he looked completely unmarked

 

You mean the same pbf who had no business at 154 who fought oscar on his terms with a stacked deck who won that fight going away 9-3? Life and death???? Log off!

 

Nah it was a competitive fight and ODLH took 4-5 rounds on the cards of most. Imagine how much better a prime ODLH would have done as opposed to a guy in his mid 30s and at the end of his career.

 

9-3? Seems to a be a favorite score of yours, you also had Jacobs beating Golovkin by the same margin....

 

You being a pbf hater being wrong about pbf seems to be your favorite. Pbf is the best fighter of the era deal with it and move on.

 

Oscar also fought Quartey.

 

Yet you're the one who laughably tried to claim that he has an advantage over ODLH h2h because he narrowly beat an old version who was at the end of his career. The thread was about who faced the stiffer competition.. You didn't like that and your insecure comment shows. How does it feel to be into your 30s and still dickriding the guy like a school girl would a boy band/pop idol? Pathetic.

 

Competitive for the first 6 rounds, then May ran away with it the last 6. Even if it was 8-4, it was still a clear victory.

Note: It was also Floyd's first fight at 154 and his first superfight.

Pretty impressive if you ask me.

 

Yeah close but clear. I won't dispute that. But that would suggest a prime or a fresher Oscar would arguably have the beating of him.

 

I don't rule anything out, that's a debate that can be had.

The Oscar who fought in the early 2000's, especially the one vs Tito would have had the best chance.

 

I admitted that oscar faced better comp in my first post. I stated that pbf was the better fighter greater fighter and he beat him h2h. Youre mad that i came in this troll thread which was started by a known troll and alt and rained on your parade with truth and you dont like it. Yeah he has a h2h adavantage over oscar hes better and more complete and i have no confidence in oscar in big fights who lost more than he won.

 

Not without fanboying and mentioning the fact that he had a win over a faded version of Oscar. Mayweather has a H2H advantage based on what? He wasn't facing the likes of Whitaker, prime Mosley, Quartey or Trinadad in his prime. Oscar fought much better opposition and performed with credit(shafted in some instances) Where are these greats that Mayweather faced at their peaks to favor him over a prime Oscar H2H?