Great trainers and their alleged disappearance from the sport

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mrkoolkevin, Feb 15, 2018.


  1. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    I know the notion that great trainers are dying off gets repeated all the time as conventional wisdom on this forum but I don't understand the basis for this claim. Can someone break this down for me? How do you know that today's trainers aren't just as good as--if not better than--those of past years? How do you know which trainers are great and which are...less-than-great? How did those great trainers of the past become great in the first place? Why weren't more of the men they trained and worked with able to become great? Do talented fighters really need great trainers to become great boxers? I'm very skeptical but I really want to understand where people are coming from.
     
    cross_trainer likes this.
  2. richdanahuff

    richdanahuff Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,492
    13,047
    Oct 12, 2013
    I never thought much of Teddy Atlas to much of a spotlight preacher but guys like Freddie Roach, Abel Sanchez, Nacho Berenstain etc.... and it seems others are good trainers but I will say living in Colorado Springs I have had some interesting conversations with USA boxing and the Army's World Class Athlete Program that IMO seems to be an issue in the pros as well about why we struggle with competing at the world level......the athletes that are coming into these programs stay in contact with their boyhood coaches and friends who try to coach from afar and many of the amateur athletes try to fight like professionals in amateur competition which does not do well in the scoring system.....it seems with exposure perhaps some fighters think they no more than their trainers???

    But the Duvas, Georgie Bentons, Emanuel Stewards, Victor Valles etc....were certainly stables of great trainers of the recent past....but I feel there are great trainers out there but they have not found the talent to begin their legacy
     
    cross_trainer likes this.
  3. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    Seems plausible...
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  4. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,126
    Jun 2, 2006
    Never rated Lou Duva or Valee as a trainer.Duva was a liability in a corner and Valle didn't give Cooney anything imo..

    Arcel,Hurley,Futch, Foster ,were trainers, McCoy,Georgino too,, Roach,Beristain,are very good.McKraken is good.
     
    Last edited: Feb 21, 2018
  5. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    What is it that makes Roach and Beristain so much better than other trainers?
     
    cross_trainer likes this.
  6. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,650
    13,049
    Apr 1, 2007
    Talent and knowledge they possess that's been handed down to them is immensely important in their teachings, I'd imagine.
     
  7. Ken Ashcroft

    Ken Ashcroft Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,912
    5,195
    Dec 23, 2008
    Some of the current fighters considered amongst the best fighters in the world today like Oleksandr Usyk, Saul Alvarez, Keith Thurman, Terrace Crawford, Vasyl Lomachenko, Mikey Garcia, Jorge Linares, Errol Spence, Naoya Inoue, etc. How many people can, without looking it up, remember or know what the names of their trainers are?
     
  8. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    Who's to say that Beristain is any more knowledgable or talented than dozens and dozens of other unknown trainers though? Honest question.
     
  9. richdanahuff

    richdanahuff Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,492
    13,047
    Oct 12, 2013
    We certainly have some talented boxing gurus coming out of the former eastern blocks....the only one I can think is Lomanchenko's father appears to be onto something but he hasn't taken in very many fighters at least not enough to show his ability to make good fighters great as it seems Vasyl and Usyk are both talented fighters he groomed from early on in his system....only time will tell as he continues to train fighters....We haven't seen FM senior turn out regular champions either. An issue we see more and more in modern boxing is that when fighters lose then change trainers like underwear.
     
    George Crowcroft and KO KIDD like this.
  10. Giacomino

    Giacomino Member Full Member

    326
    151
    Oct 15, 2016
    My thinking is that trainers today are much more one-dimensional than trainers from the past. The old school guys were much more well-rounded and, in my opinion, could teach different styles much more effectively. The modern guys (the ones who are good anyway) generally train one particular style well - perhaps because they're working with a much reduced pool of fighters than in previous generations.

    Then, because no one is going to give up a real, rare prospect, you get unhappy marriages where the trainer trains fighters according to his own strengths rather than the fighter's.

    Second main reason is the 'character' of the fighters these days. Default reaction to a loss? Sack the trainer. How can you learn from a mistake if you aren't even man enough to admit you made one? Wasn't like that back in the day.
     
  11. greynotsoold

    greynotsoold Boxing Addict

    5,524
    7,085
    Aug 17, 2011
    One of those guys does basically none of the day to day gym work. One of them is not considered a great trainer, but very good at getting guys in shape. You might be surprised to learn how often a "great" trainer is "great" because of sparring; he has good fighters in his gym to learn from one another, not from him.

    Boxing is basically a name game and who you know. Once you 'get a name' you get better fighters; better fighters created by somebody that doesn't know anybody. On the other hand, the number of potentially talented boxers ruined by buffoons with punch mitts is huge. I figure it has always been that way.

    My partner has to be in the hunt for the best in the game, certainly the best I have seen. He has worked with two world champions, trained a third from the start of his career. He trained an Olympian and a PanAm games winner from day one and a handful of amateurs he started went on to win world titles as pros with other people. He is well known in boxing- he persuaded Kallen to take a chance on Nonito Donaire- but I doubt any of you have heard of him.
     
  12. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    Great post, thanks for the breakdown!
     
  13. Bukkake

    Bukkake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,493
    3,720
    Apr 20, 2010
    Neither do I!

    The idea of knowledge being "lost" over time, and that some superior techniques/methods have died out along with great trainers, is of course pure nonsense. It's just something old-timers (and young fans as well, who somehow find pleasure in believing, that everything was better back in the "good old days") like to say, in an attempt to put down the present.
     
    Pat M, mrkoolkevin and JoffJoff like this.
  14. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    It probably has to do with the massive change in the culture of boxing.

    More boxercise gyms, a far greater amateur system, less real classic style boxing gyms, commercialization of boxing, etc.
     
  15. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    Capitalism is what ruined boxing.
     
    Sting like a bean likes this.