I don't get why people think a 70's Foreman beats a prime Tyson

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by InMemoryofJakeLamotta, Feb 11, 2018.


  1. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,692
    9,898
    Jun 9, 2010
    I find this^ both interesting and disturbing, at the same time.

    I'm assuming, with such an emphatic rejection of the idea that chins do not get better over time, that there are scientific papers you could reference to support your opposition to this common sense belief?

    If so, please cite the papers, which would support your position.
     
  2. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,560
    11,991
    Sep 21, 2017
    No one's knocking down Tyson early. A prolonged beating is the only way he ever went down. I'm sorry, but odds are, if a man who as a washed up fighter stood up to Lewis best shots for 8 rounds fought a guy who in or close to his prime went down in round 3 or 4 from Ron Lyle, the man who withstood punishment from Lennox Lewis for 8 rounds is likely to be the one who doesn't go down early. That's as plain as I can put it.
     
    Sangria likes this.
  3. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,560
    11,991
    Sep 21, 2017
    I've seen the fight and Douglas utilized his reach by jabbing, moving and throwing combinations. Always trying to get his shots off first while staying out of range for Tyson to hit him back. He didn't offer his chin on a platter. The one time Tyson caught him cold on the chin, it nearly threw Douglas masterful performance out the window. And luckily, for Douglas, it came right as the round ended.

    Maybe Douglas wasn't a better fighter than Foreman, but he certainly was a better boxer.
     
  4. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,560
    11,991
    Sep 21, 2017
    I'm not going into the Tucker fight. I saw him throw power shots, you didn't. So I know we'll never agree. Except for the odd fact that Tyson was hard to land clean on and had a habit of countering his opponents missed shots which discouraged them and made them go into survival mode and excessively clinch and grab and hold. It wasn't like this only happened with Tony Tucker.
     
  5. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,560
    11,991
    Sep 21, 2017
    I think he's just saying that the human body can adapt. Kind of like, if you work with your hands, they form callouses and the skin gets rougher. In this context, he's just saying the body can adapt to take punches. I'll go one step further, scientists have found that even vividly imagining yourself doing something can activate the same neural pathways that doing it in real life does, so just imagining yourself doing something long enough can make you better at it as practicing it in real life.

    In Ali's case, regarding his chin, it did seem to get better with age up to a point. At 18 or 19, he was floored by Sonny Banks at 21 floored by Henry Cooper. At 32, he took monstrous punishment from Foreman and was never knocked down, was taking Frazier's best shots at 33 and wasn't knocked down and was decked by Shavers at 35 and didn't go down. Those same shots may have turned out the lights of a 18-21 year old Ali.
     
  6. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    Name me any fight where Tyson flat out brawled, I'll be in for a long wait.
     
  7. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,560
    11,991
    Sep 21, 2017
    Tyson/Ruddock....guess it depends on how you're defining the word "brawl".
     
  8. BUDW

    BUDW Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,928
    827
    Nov 23, 2007
    Foreman had a punishing jab and brutal power he backs Tyson up and Ko's him
     
    JC40 and The Morlocks like this.
  9. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,560
    11,991
    Sep 21, 2017
    Tyson's style was built to get around jabs. Foreman's jab was powerful, but not terribly speedy. Plus Tyson had top end KO power as well. Foreman isn't walking through Tyson's power either.
     
    Sangria likes this.
  10. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    No he did not, he tried his upmost to evade Ruddock's shots. You will have to do better than that I'm afraid.
     
    JC40 and Contro like this.
  11. Contro

    Contro Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,882
    4,701
    Jun 7, 2016
    How about mcneeley. Also Bruno 1. He tried to take Bruno's head off in round 1 as if he had walked in on him screwing his wife.
    I agree with you on ruddock 1. There was no " head movement" because ruddock was not snapping out jabs and rights. If the same Tyson of the ruddock fights had fought a Tucker or a Williams you bet your ass he would have tried to move his head
     
  12. BUDW

    BUDW Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,928
    827
    Nov 23, 2007
    Mitch Green
     
  13. BUDW

    BUDW Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,928
    827
    Nov 23, 2007
    I take it you forgot what Buster Douglas did to Tyson off the jab
     
    Glass City Cobra and JC40 like this.
  14. JC40

    JC40 Boxing fan since 1972 banned Full Member

    1,098
    1,872
    Jul 12, 2008
    I seem to remember Buster's jab basically turning Tyson's head into a speed bag.

    Buster did land some big straight right hands in round two though. I do believe you had to get Mike's respect which Buster did. Then he was able to control Mike with the jab as Mike was leery of Buster's straight right hand.

    Cheers All.
     
    JohnThomas1 and BUDW like this.
  15. Contro

    Contro Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,882
    4,701
    Jun 7, 2016
    Sorry but terrible example. Different style, different jab, different attributes and tbh completely different skill levels.
    George foreman in the 70s was more of an amazing physical specimen than anything else. He knocked out a guy who was taylor made for him and another who lost early to every big puncher he fought and was then exposed as one dimensional and crude. 90s george was much less of a physical specimen but a much greater fighter

    Interestingly enough same thing happened to tyson when he regressed to being just a physical specimen and abandoned his great skills.
     
    mrkoolkevin likes this.