Ezzard Charles vs Tony Tucker primes

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by InMemoryofJakeLamotta, Feb 3, 2018.


  1. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,157
    11,640
    Sep 21, 2017
    Could Charles with his masterful skills overcome the bigger and skilled in his own right Tony TNT Tucker? Say the Charles of the Louis fight vs the best version of Tucker?
     
  2. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,683
    2,560
    Oct 18, 2004
  3. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    Charles all day. I don't know where this myth came from that Charles couldn't beat heavyweights over 200 lbs. He beat a 220 lb Louis, stopped 210 lb Baksi, knocked out 201 lb Coley Wallace, decisioned 220 lb Bob Albright, stopped a 6'6" 260 lb nobody named Dave Ashley who was knocked out 10 previous times.

    Size was a non issue for Charles.
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta and NoNeck like this.
  4. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,290
    11,658
    Mar 19, 2012
    The Conk vs the Jeri Curl. Two dangerous guys here.
     
  5. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,157
    11,640
    Sep 21, 2017
    So who gets the win?
     
  6. The Kentucky Cobra

    The Kentucky Cobra Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,576
    2,517
    Jan 9, 2017

    Charles outboxes him to a convincing decision.
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.
  7. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,574
    Jan 30, 2014
    I think Charles would have struggled against any number of skilled, mobile big men, including Tucker. Tucker UD12.
     
  8. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,391
    45,846
    Feb 11, 2005
    Tucker never really lived up to his promise. Still, he was formidable and durable and skilled. I think Charles, at his peak, figures out a way to get a decision.
     
  9. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,157
    11,640
    Sep 21, 2017
    Like I lean towards Spinks to have gotten a decision against Tucker, I do the same with Charles. Not a foregone conclusion, though. But if there was a smaller man who could find a way to beat Tucker, Charles was it. You're right though about Charles struggling in this one.
     
  10. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,157
    11,640
    Sep 21, 2017
    Well it would depend on who he was fighting...if it was say Lennox Lewis, I don't know about that.
     
    Seamus likes this.
  11. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,721
    29,069
    Jun 2, 2006
    Size is always an issue if the bigger man is quality.
     
    BlackCloud and robert ungurean like this.
  12. BlackCloud

    BlackCloud I detest the daily heavyweight threads Full Member

    3,201
    3,373
    Nov 22, 2012
    Unless of course the smaller guy once fought Marciano, which, by default, raises their stock by 23-35% due to the laws of physics not applying by order of the Pope.
     
    mrkoolkevin likes this.
  13. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    29,443
    35,946
    Jan 8, 2017
    Charles the more quality fighter ,he'd win a decision ,though Tucker would show flashes of good work .Neither man is ever really hurt .
     
  14. Knights107

    Knights107 Member Full Member

    450
    211
    Aug 13, 2015
    @LHW Charles for sure :biggrin::biggrin::biggrin:
     
  15. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,157
    11,640
    Sep 21, 2017
    That's what I meant. If Charles were fighting say a bigger man like 6'6 245 lbs Jess Willard, size would be much less of an issue than if Charles was fighting 6'6 245 lbs Lennox Lewis, in which size could be the determining factor of the outcome.