Who would win Golovkin or Charlo?

You don't even believe this crap. So why post it?

 

No , most sane people thought the fight would favour Canelo if 'boxer' Golovkin turned up. GGG along with everybody else knew he needed a knockout or total domination to win and he didn't try to achieve either.

He gave the fight away and never lived up to his moniker of delivering 'Mexican style'.

Mexician style is Chavez applying non-stop pressure against Rosario and not worried about is savage hitting power when ripping into him in the pocket and on the ropes.
Chavez fought like a man who wouldn't be denied stopping Rosario who was the favorite for the WBA 135 belt.

GGG never produced a round with the same intensity against a much lighter puncher p4p. His 'Mexican style' is Mickey Mouse style. If he didn't insert his dominance within Nelo's wheelhouse , than i have no reason to believe he would inside Charlo's.

 

A plague has swept over this thread.....

 

Derevyanchenko would beat the **** out of Charlo.

 

I do believe it.

 

Sure he would.

 

What does it matter if GGG fought Mexican style or not? The people that bought into that haven't actually sit down and watched any GGG. Those aren't sane fans. All your hatred would be subdued if you'd stop letting brainless fans get to you.

 

One to the next one already....

 

A lot of these idiots only look at what fans say and make their judgments based on fans they often call 'liars'... go figure..

 

More like you're on to the next one.

 

Charlo sucks.

 

Easy work for GGG.

 

GGG, twice on Sunday.

 

Next what? You are the one who jumps from guy to guy as to who you clam will beat 3g. Face it, you're just desperate to see him lose in any way. Hell, look at what you scored the 3G - Jacobs fight. What a joke...

 

Golovkin has been in two close fights , both he has won by 3 rounds. This doesn't mean a badge holder from 154 gives him trouble.

GGG in about 4 rounds and then everyone goes 'what's the point in that'